The Mixed Methods Research Approach: An Overview

Mixed methods research involves using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies in a single study or inquiry to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the issue under investigation. The methodology draws from the potential strengths of both the quantitative and qualitative methodologies, allowing researchers to explore diverse views and unearth relationships that abound in the intricate layers of multifaceted research questions. This paper, thus, provides the rationale and philosophical underpinnings of the mixed methods approach while also discussing the paradigms (positivistic/interpretivist/constructivist) from which the mixed methods approach is drawn. Consequently, the main advantages of the mixed methods approach are discussed, these include that the approach enables the research questions to be answered in breadth and depth, helps test validity by converging information from different research methods, transcends the limitations of exclusive quantitative and qualitative research methodologies and responds to questions that either qualitative or quantitative methodologies cannot answer alone. Furthermore, mixed methods research fosters and enriches researchers’ experiences and enables the exploration of diverse perspectives while also revealing the relationships between different layers of phenomena. This article further highlights the limitations of the mixed methods approach, which appear measly as compared to its pros. Thus, the limitations are: the need for more time and finances to undertake and accomplish the research, increased research workload, and the need for expert involvement at some or all phases of the research. Undoubtedly, the advantages of the mixed-methods approach far outweigh its limitations, hence, it is concluded that the mixed-methods design provides the best chance of responding to research questions exhaustively by its ability to combine two sets of approaches while, at the same time, making up for the weaknesses of each method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postmodernism Problems
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46324/pmp2501084
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mixed Methods Research Approach: An Overview

Evelyn Wanjiru Njurai, Audrey Matere, Josephine Oranga
5 citations
Postmodernism Problems
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
10.53
article

The Mixed Methods Research Approach: An Overview

Evelyn Wanjiru Njurai, Audrey Matere, Josephine Oranga
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Mixed methods research involves using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies in a single study or inquiry to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the issue under investigation. The methodology draws from the potential strengths of both the quantitative and qualitative methodologies, allowing researchers to explore diverse views and unearth relationships that abound in the intricate layers of multifaceted research questions. This paper, thus, provides the rationale and philosophical underpinnings of the mixed methods approach while also discussing the paradigms (positivistic/interpretivist/constructivist) from which the mixed methods approach is drawn. Consequently, the main advantages of the mixed methods approach are discussed, these include that the approach enables the research questions to be answered in breadth and depth, helps test validity by converging information from different research methods, transcends the limitations of exclusive quantitative and qualitative research methodologies and responds to questions that either qualitative or quantitative methodologies cannot answer alone. Furthermore, mixed methods research fosters and enriches researchers’ experiences and enables the exploration of diverse perspectives while also revealing the relationships between different layers of phenomena. This article further highlights the limitations of the mixed methods approach, which appear measly as compared to its pros. Thus, the limitations are: the need for more time and finances to undertake and accomplish the research, increased research workload, and the need for expert involvement at some or all phases of the research. Undoubtedly, the advantages of the mixed-methods approach far outweigh its limitations, hence, it is concluded that the mixed-methods design provides the best chance of responding to research questions exhaustively by its ability to combine two sets of approaches while, at the same time, making up for the weaknesses of each method.

Postmodernism ProblemsVol. 15(1)
Kisii University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.