Comparative evaluation of gamma interferen tests in vitro for detection of cell-mediated immune response to recombinant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis antigens in detection of tuberculosis infection

Introduction. Laboratory methods based on the detection of T-cell sensitization are widely used to diagnose tuberculosis infection. These tests belong to the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) group and play an important role in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection, as well as serving as an alternative to traditional intradermal testing. IGRA tests utilize a single principle but employ different approaches in conducting and analyzing research data. A detailed understanding of these approaches can help select the optimal test system and increase its clinical significance. This study aims to compare and characterize the test systems available for immunological cell-mediated diagnosis of tuberculosis in Russia. Materials and Methods. To compare IGRA tests available in Russia, we selected the following: T-SPOT.TB, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, and TB-Feron IGRAs. We analyzed their performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, as well as the cost and availability of each test. We conducted a literature review on the aforementioned tests and their applications in clinical practice. We also consulted experts in the field to gain a deeper understanding of the nuances of each test system. Based on our findings, we formulated recommendations for selecting the most appropriate test for a given patient, taking into account factors such as cost, availability, and clinical relevance. Each test was conducted on 24 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of active tuberculosis, 16 patients with latent tuberculosis infection, and 10 healthy individuals. Results. The study revealed that for the active tuberculosis group (n=24), 19 patients had a positive test result using T-SPOT, while 19 patients had a positive QuantiFERON result, and 13 patients had a positive TB-Feron result. For the latent tuberculosis group (n=16), 15 patients showed a positive T-SPOT result, 14 patients showed a positive QuantiFERON, and 14 patients showed a positive TB-Feron test. In the healthy group, all patients tested negative for tuberculosis using all three test systems. Conclusion. Overall, the study confirms the convergence of immunoassay tests for latent tuberculosis, as well as the advantage of using short-chain Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in the diagnosis of active TB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Service
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/labs20251401113
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of gamma interferen tests in vitro for detection of cell-mediated immune response to recombinant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis antigens in detection of tuberculosis infection

D.А. Kudlаy, E. A. Pogodina, E.V. Sorokina, A. V. Lobov et al.
Laboratory Service
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Comparative evaluation of gamma interferen tests in vitro for detection of cell-mediated immune response to recombinant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis antigens in detection of tuberculosis infection

D.А. Kudlаy, E. A. Pogodina, E.V. Sorokina, A. V. Lobov, Patrīcija Ivanova, И. Ж. Шубина
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Laboratory methods based on the detection of T-cell sensitization are widely used to diagnose tuberculosis infection. These tests belong to the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) group and play an important role in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection, as well as serving as an alternative to traditional intradermal testing. IGRA tests utilize a single principle but employ different approaches in conducting and analyzing research data. A detailed understanding of these approaches can help select the optimal test system and increase its clinical significance. This study aims to compare and characterize the test systems available for immunological cell-mediated diagnosis of tuberculosis in Russia. Materials and Methods. To compare IGRA tests available in Russia, we selected the following: T-SPOT.TB, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, and TB-Feron IGRAs. We analyzed their performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, as well as the cost and availability of each test. We conducted a literature review on the aforementioned tests and their applications in clinical practice. We also consulted experts in the field to gain a deeper understanding of the nuances of each test system. Based on our findings, we formulated recommendations for selecting the most appropriate test for a given patient, taking into account factors such as cost, availability, and clinical relevance. Each test was conducted on 24 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of active tuberculosis, 16 patients with latent tuberculosis infection, and 10 healthy individuals. Results. The study revealed that for the active tuberculosis group (n=24), 19 patients had a positive test result using T-SPOT, while 19 patients had a positive QuantiFERON result, and 13 patients had a positive TB-Feron result. For the latent tuberculosis group (n=16), 15 patients showed a positive T-SPOT result, 14 patients showed a positive QuantiFERON, and 14 patients showed a positive TB-Feron test. In the healthy group, all patients tested negative for tuberculosis using all three test systems. Conclusion. Overall, the study confirms the convergence of immunoassay tests for latent tuberculosis, as well as the advantage of using short-chain Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in the diagnosis of active TB.

Laboratory ServiceVol. 14(1)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Immunology and Physiology (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera. Mechnikov of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.