MicroCT-based dental age estimation: Method comparison of the London Atlas and regression equations for deciduous and permanent teeth applied on central European infants of the 19th century

• Evidence-based comparison of age estimation methods for deciduous/permanent teeth. • Most accurate estimates for regression methods for deciduous teeth and London Atlas. • Performance of methods for permanent teeth improved for individuals ≤ 3 years. • Higher weighting of first mineralising teeth may improve accuracy of London Atlas. • µCT scans are suitable for tooth length measurements in dental age estimation. Tooth mineralisation and alveolar eruption show a strong temporal correlation with the chronological age of sub-adults and thus represent a valuable asset for age estimation in archaeology and forensic science. Despite the vast number of various dental age estimation methods published, evidence-based comparison of their degree of accuracy is lacking. This study aimed (1) to evaluate if µCT scans are a reliable alternative to conventional techniques for tooth length measurements and (2) to compare the accuracy and reliability of the London Atlas of Tooth Development and Eruption with six well-established regression methods for age estimation of subadults. Forty-two skulls of a Central European osteological collection of the early 19th century (known age at death 7 months in utero–11 years) were scanned with µCT to estimate dental age via London Atlas-classification and regression equations based on deciduous and permanent tooth length measurements. Tooth length measurements via µCT proved to be a technically feasible method with an excellent agreement with caliper measurements.Regression equations of Liversidge (1993) and Cardoso (2019) for the deciduous dentition and London atlas yielded the most accurate age estimates (prediction errors: 0.20–0.30 years). Regression equations for permanent teeth were less accurate; however, performance was improved when their application was restricted to individuals ≤ 3 years of age. Most accurate age estimates for single teeth were achieved for deciduous incisors, canines and first molars. µCT extends the spectrum of tools available for tooth length assessment. While regression equations for deciduous teeth represent a reliable age estimation method for younger individuals, the London Atlas outperforms the regression equations for permanent teeth. It thus can be considered a preferred alternative to estimate age in older individuals (>3 years) with an adequate state of conservation. A higher weighting of the first mineralising deciduous teeth can contribute to further improving the accuracy of the London Atlas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105105
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MicroCT-based dental age estimation: Method comparison of the London Atlas and regression equations for deciduous and permanent teeth applied on central European infants of the 19th century

Patrick Heimel, Stefan Lettner, Karoline Maria Reich, Stefan Tangl et al.
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

MicroCT-based dental age estimation: Method comparison of the London Atlas and regression equations for deciduous and permanent teeth applied on central European infants of the 19th century

Patrick Heimel, Stefan Lettner, Karoline Maria Reich, Stefan Tangl, Johannes Kirchner
article en

Abstract

• Evidence-based comparison of age estimation methods for deciduous/permanent teeth. • Most accurate estimates for regression methods for deciduous teeth and London Atlas. • Performance of methods for permanent teeth improved for individuals ≤ 3 years. • Higher weighting of first mineralising teeth may improve accuracy of London Atlas. • µCT scans are suitable for tooth length measurements in dental age estimation. Tooth mineralisation and alveolar eruption show a strong temporal correlation with the chronological age of sub-adults and thus represent a valuable asset for age estimation in archaeology and forensic science. Despite the vast number of various dental age estimation methods published, evidence-based comparison of their degree of accuracy is lacking. This study aimed (1) to evaluate if µCT scans are a reliable alternative to conventional techniques for tooth length measurements and (2) to compare the accuracy and reliability of the London Atlas of Tooth Development and Eruption with six well-established regression methods for age estimation of subadults. Forty-two skulls of a Central European osteological collection of the early 19th century (known age at death 7 months in utero–11 years) were scanned with µCT to estimate dental age via London Atlas-classification and regression equations based on deciduous and permanent tooth length measurements. Tooth length measurements via µCT proved to be a technically feasible method with an excellent agreement with caliper measurements.Regression equations of Liversidge (1993) and Cardoso (2019) for the deciduous dentition and London atlas yielded the most accurate age estimates (prediction errors: 0.20–0.30 years). Regression equations for permanent teeth were less accurate; however, performance was improved when their application was restricted to individuals ≤ 3 years of age. Most accurate age estimates for single teeth were achieved for deciduous incisors, canines and first molars. µCT extends the spectrum of tools available for tooth length assessment. While regression equations for deciduous teeth represent a reliable age estimation method for younger individuals, the London Atlas outperforms the regression equations for permanent teeth. It thus can be considered a preferred alternative to estimate age in older individuals (>3 years) with an adequate state of conservation. A higher weighting of the first mineralising deciduous teeth can contribute to further improving the accuracy of the London Atlas.

Journal of Archaeological Science ReportsVol. 64
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA (AT), Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.