Occurrence and spread of carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in the food chain in the EU/EFTA. Part 1: 2025 update

Abstract Carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales (CPE) have been reported in the food chain in 14 out of 30 EU/EFTA countries. Commonly reported genes are blaVIM‐1, blaOXA‐48 and blaOXA‐181, followed by blaNDM‐5 and blaIMI‐1. Escherichia coli, target of most of the studies, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella pneumoniae complex and Salmonella Infantis are the most frequent CPE. E. coli isolates show a high clonal diversity. IncHI2 (blaVIM‐1 and blaOXA‐162), IncC (blaVIM‐1 and blaNDM‐1), IncX3 (blaNDM‐5 and blaOXA‐181), IncI and IncL (blaOXA‐48) plasmids are frequently reported. Most reports are from terrestrial food‐producing animals and their environments – mainly pigs, followed by bovines and poultry and with occasional reports of meat thereof (targets of the EU monitoring and follow up trace back investigations). Few studies have investigated foods of aquatic animal origin and of non‐animal origin, finding a great CPE diversity. A notable increase in the number of CPE detections has been observed, predominantly from pigs, with a surge in certain countries in 2021 (blaOXA‐181, Italy) and 2023 (blaOXA‐48, Spain; blaOXA‐181, blaOXA‐48, blaOXA‐244 and blaNDM‐5, Portugal). Very few data points to circumstantial evidence of CPE transmission, clonal and/or horizontal gene spread within the food chain and from/to humans. Various methods are used in the EU/EFTA countries to detect and characterise CPE in the food chain. Improvement of their sensitivity should be investigated. Ten out of 30 EU/EFTA countries have specific contingency plans for CPE control, being epidemiological investigations (e.g. trace‐back) a common action included in those plans. Overall, data remain scarce for the bacterial species and sources beyond those systematically monitored. Recommendations to fill data gaps on other bacterial species and sources, dissemination pathways and optimisation of detection methods are given. A One Health approach to address the drivers of CPE spread in the food chain is needed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9336
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occurrence and spread of carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in the food chain in the EU/EFTA. Part 1: 2025 update

Maarten Nauta, Valeria Bortolaia, Ana Allende, Fernando Pérez‐Rodríguez et al.
7 citations
EFSA Journal
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
4.14
article

Occurrence and spread of carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in the food chain in the EU/EFTA. Part 1: 2025 update

Maarten Nauta, Valeria Bortolaia, Ana Allende, Fernando Pérez‐Rodríguez, Anke Kohlenberg, Lapo Mughini‐Gras, Sara Bover‐Cid, Alessandra Carattoli, Panagiotis Skandamis, Avelino Álvarez‐Ordóñez, E. Liébana, Laurent Guillier, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Wietske Dohmen, Dominique L. Monnet, Héctor Argüello, Luı́sa Peixe, Núria Ferrer‐Bustins, Alessandra De Cesare, Johan Bengtsson‐Palme, Laurent Poirel, Sonagnon Martin Goudjihounde, Elisabetta Suffredini, Beatriz Guerra, Lieve Herman, Raquel García‐Fierro, Jakob Ottoson, Hanne Rabbås
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacterales (CPE) have been reported in the food chain in 14 out of 30 EU/EFTA countries. Commonly reported genes are blaVIM‐1, blaOXA‐48 and blaOXA‐181, followed by blaNDM‐5 and blaIMI‐1. Escherichia coli, target of most of the studies, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella pneumoniae complex and Salmonella Infantis are the most frequent CPE. E. coli isolates show a high clonal diversity. IncHI2 (blaVIM‐1 and blaOXA‐162), IncC (blaVIM‐1 and blaNDM‐1), IncX3 (blaNDM‐5 and blaOXA‐181), IncI and IncL (blaOXA‐48) plasmids are frequently reported. Most reports are from terrestrial food‐producing animals and their environments – mainly pigs, followed by bovines and poultry and with occasional reports of meat thereof (targets of the EU monitoring and follow up trace back investigations). Few studies have investigated foods of aquatic animal origin and of non‐animal origin, finding a great CPE diversity. A notable increase in the number of CPE detections has been observed, predominantly from pigs, with a surge in certain countries in 2021 (blaOXA‐181, Italy) and 2023 (blaOXA‐48, Spain; blaOXA‐181, blaOXA‐48, blaOXA‐244 and blaNDM‐5, Portugal). Very few data points to circumstantial evidence of CPE transmission, clonal and/or horizontal gene spread within the food chain and from/to humans. Various methods are used in the EU/EFTA countries to detect and characterise CPE in the food chain. Improvement of their sensitivity should be investigated. Ten out of 30 EU/EFTA countries have specific contingency plans for CPE control, being epidemiological investigations (e.g. trace‐back) a common action included in those plans. Overall, data remain scarce for the bacterial species and sources beyond those systematically monitored. Recommendations to fill data gaps on other bacterial species and sources, dissemination pathways and optimisation of detection methods are given. A One Health approach to address the drivers of CPE spread in the food chain is needed.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
4.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.