A comparative study between price-driven and mechanistic moving averages using causal analysis on bitcoin historical data

The subject of this study is the comparative analysis of price-driven and mechanistic moving averages applied to Bitcoin volume and price data, using causal analysis to assess profitability and accuracy in historical records. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of mechanistic versus price-driven moving averages in predicting Bitcoin price trends. The objectives are as follows: 1) To evaluate the performance of the traditional price-driven simple moving average (SMA) against a mechanistic simple moving average (MSMA) that incorporates trading volume as an asset "mass"; 2) Perform backtesting with fast and slow moving average crossovers to determine each method’s profitability and trade accuracy across different parameter settings; 3) To calculate cause-and-effect relationships between moving average choice and observed trading outcomes, and further between Bitcoin price trend directions and returns using causal analysis; 4) To analyze the implications of these results on trading strategies within the volatile cryptocurrency market. The following results were obtained: 1) The price-driven SMA demonstrated higher profitability and higher volatility compared to MSMA which yielded more uniform but lower returns with significantly better trade accuracy; 2) Correlation analysis found stronger relationships between return and win rate for MSMA than for SMA, suggesting MSMA’s relative stability in volatile trading environments; 3) Causal analysis confirmed a statistically significant causal relationship between MSMA use and consistent returns; 4) MSMA returns were strongly affected by market trends with uptrends yielding higher returns than downtrends by 16%. Conclusions. This research contributes to the cryptocurrency technical analysis by demonstrating the advantages and limitations of price-driven and mechanistic moving averages. While SMA is better suited for researchers prioritizing higher potential returns despite volatility, MSMA offers a stable, volume-based approach. The study provides valuable insights for researchers aiming to refine investment strategies in the fast-evolving the cryptocurrency sector.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2025.1.03
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study between price-driven and mechanistic moving averages using causal analysis on bitcoin historical data

I. V. Tsapro
RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

A comparative study between price-driven and mechanistic moving averages using causal analysis on bitcoin historical data

I. V. Tsapro
article en

Abstract

The subject of this study is the comparative analysis of price-driven and mechanistic moving averages applied to Bitcoin volume and price data, using causal analysis to assess profitability and accuracy in historical records. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of mechanistic versus price-driven moving averages in predicting Bitcoin price trends. The objectives are as follows: 1) To evaluate the performance of the traditional price-driven simple moving average (SMA) against a mechanistic simple moving average (MSMA) that incorporates trading volume as an asset "mass"; 2) Perform backtesting with fast and slow moving average crossovers to determine each method’s profitability and trade accuracy across different parameter settings; 3) To calculate cause-and-effect relationships between moving average choice and observed trading outcomes, and further between Bitcoin price trend directions and returns using causal analysis; 4) To analyze the implications of these results on trading strategies within the volatile cryptocurrency market. The following results were obtained: 1) The price-driven SMA demonstrated higher profitability and higher volatility compared to MSMA which yielded more uniform but lower returns with significantly better trade accuracy; 2) Correlation analysis found stronger relationships between return and win rate for MSMA than for SMA, suggesting MSMA’s relative stability in volatile trading environments; 3) Causal analysis confirmed a statistically significant causal relationship between MSMA use and consistent returns; 4) MSMA returns were strongly affected by market trends with uptrends yielding higher returns than downtrends by 16%. Conclusions. This research contributes to the cryptocurrency technical analysis by demonstrating the advantages and limitations of price-driven and mechanistic moving averages. While SMA is better suited for researchers prioritizing higher potential returns despite volatility, MSMA offers a stable, volume-based approach. The study provides valuable insights for researchers aiming to refine investment strategies in the fast-evolving the cryptocurrency sector.

RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMSVol. 2025(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative study between price-driven and mechanistic moving averages using causal analysis on bitcoin historical data — I. V. Tsapro · RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS