Challenges of projectification in an engineering school: Lessons learned and room for improving the whole performance of the institution

The management model in higher education institutions is in continuous change: from an initial hierarchical and functional organization, the subsequent influence of the New Public Management model and more recently project-based management, conditioned among other causes by how a large part of the financing of universities (programs and projects) is being articulated. This management model affects all the activities carried out by universities, particularly teaching and research, as well as the way staff must perform their functions. Like all models, project-oriented management has its opportunities and challenges. This paper examines the implications of project-based learning in the university environment. To explore this topic, the authors conducted a case study involving an engineering school in the Middle East and developed semi-structured interviews. This approach allowed the examination of how academic professionals perceive the increasing trend of projectification across six areas: Teaching and Curriculum, Research and Funding, Doctoral Studies, Administration and Governance, Academic Professional Development, and the overall University Culture. The results reveal that, although projectification benefits the institution in general, it is accompanied by a series of negative implications that affect both individuals and the management. The complexity and the different missions and values of universities highlight the need for a nuanced approach to project management to optimize management without jeopardizing academic excellence, especially in the field of teaching and research. Academic staff is not exempt from the need for permanent training, and it is necessary to incorporate project management and its principles to capacity-building programs to ensure their best performance. • Academic practitioners see projectification as a risk to funding and groundbreaking research output. • Understanding the key role of the time is essential in order to implement a successful projectification of the University. • The evolving nature of academic projects demands a nuanced approach to project management in research environments. • To face projectification challenges, universities must prioritize strategic planning and fair resource distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101487
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of projectification in an engineering school: Lessons learned and room for improving the whole performance of the institution

Claudette El Hajj, Germán Martínez Montes
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Challenges of projectification in an engineering school: Lessons learned and room for improving the whole performance of the institution

Claudette El Hajj, Germán Martínez Montes
article en

Abstract

The management model in higher education institutions is in continuous change: from an initial hierarchical and functional organization, the subsequent influence of the New Public Management model and more recently project-based management, conditioned among other causes by how a large part of the financing of universities (programs and projects) is being articulated. This management model affects all the activities carried out by universities, particularly teaching and research, as well as the way staff must perform their functions. Like all models, project-oriented management has its opportunities and challenges. This paper examines the implications of project-based learning in the university environment. To explore this topic, the authors conducted a case study involving an engineering school in the Middle East and developed semi-structured interviews. This approach allowed the examination of how academic professionals perceive the increasing trend of projectification across six areas: Teaching and Curriculum, Research and Funding, Doctoral Studies, Administration and Governance, Academic Professional Development, and the overall University Culture. The results reveal that, although projectification benefits the institution in general, it is accompanied by a series of negative implications that affect both individuals and the management. The complexity and the different missions and values of universities highlight the need for a nuanced approach to project management to optimize management without jeopardizing academic excellence, especially in the field of teaching and research. Academic staff is not exempt from the need for permanent training, and it is necessary to incorporate project management and its principles to capacity-building programs to ensure their best performance. • Academic practitioners see projectification as a risk to funding and groundbreaking research output. • Understanding the key role of the time is essential in order to implement a successful projectification of the University. • The evolving nature of academic projects demands a nuanced approach to project management in research environments. • To face projectification challenges, universities must prioritize strategic planning and fair resource distribution.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 11
Universidad de Granada (ES), Notre Dame University – Louaize (LB)
Universidad de Granada
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.