Pre-grant opposition: a strategic tool for patent invalidation and boosting innovation

The article outlines the process of pre-grant opposition and the requisite criterion for the same. The case in question is an application for a patent that faced significant objections on the absence of inventive steps and the subject matter falling under non-patentable sections of the Patent Act from the Patent Office and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). CSIR filed a pre-grant opposition in the form of representation, challenging the patentability of the application on grounds covered u/s 25(1). Indian patent office accepted the representation filed by CSIR and denied the grant of patent under Section 25(1) as per Rule 55(6). Then the appellant appealed in the High Court at New Delhi and the court concluded that the subject application did not meet the requirements of Section 3(d) and Section 2(1)(ja) of the Act, and the invention did not address the objection raised by the Indian patent office.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2025.145580
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-grant opposition: a strategic tool for patent invalidation and boosting innovation

P. Maiti, Bhanu Verma, Shibaji Ghosh, Ajayta Agarwal
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Pre-grant opposition: a strategic tool for patent invalidation and boosting innovation

P. Maiti, Bhanu Verma, Shibaji Ghosh, Ajayta Agarwal
article en

Abstract

The article outlines the process of pre-grant opposition and the requisite criterion for the same. The case in question is an application for a patent that faced significant objections on the absence of inventive steps and the subject matter falling under non-patentable sections of the Patent Act from the Patent Office and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). CSIR filed a pre-grant opposition in the form of representation, challenging the patentability of the application on grounds covered u/s 25(1). Indian patent office accepted the representation filed by CSIR and denied the grant of patent under Section 25(1) as per Rule 55(6). Then the appellant appealed in the High Court at New Delhi and the court concluded that the subject application did not meet the requirements of Section 3(d) and Section 2(1)(ja) of the Act, and the invention did not address the objection raised by the Indian patent office.

International Journal of Intellectual Property ManagementVol. 15(2)
Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute (IN), National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pre-grant opposition: a strategic tool for patent invalidation and boosting innovation — P. Maiti, Bhanu Verma, et al. · International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS