European Union Case Law on Excessive Pricing: An Economic Assessment

Abstract This paper examines the European Union’s case law on the prohibition of charging excessive pricing. Its cornerstone is the Court of Justice’s statement that a price is excessive if it bears no reasonable relation to its economic value under competitive conditions. This paper argues that economic value should correspond to the firm’s long-run average total costs, including incurred and opportunity costs, at the level of actual output. Accordingly, the paper concludes that the jurisprudence is based on sound economic principles, as it aims to protect consumers from the abuse of a dominant position, without significantly influencing investment decisions by allowing investors to earn a return on their investments commensurate with the risks they take. The main problem in sanctioning excessive pricing is practical: the difficulty of measuring economic costs. The case law considers a less cumbersome alternative: comparing the defendant’s price with the price of the same or comparable products in more competitive markets, but with obvious homologation complexities. Safeguards have therefore been put in place to minimize the risk of false convictions, including considering a price to be excessive only if it significantly exceeds costs and allowing defendants to rebut the competition authority’s findings with objective data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf009
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European Union Case Law on Excessive Pricing: An Economic Assessment

Pablo Serra
1 citations
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
2.07
article

European Union Case Law on Excessive Pricing: An Economic Assessment

Pablo Serra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the European Union’s case law on the prohibition of charging excessive pricing. Its cornerstone is the Court of Justice’s statement that a price is excessive if it bears no reasonable relation to its economic value under competitive conditions. This paper argues that economic value should correspond to the firm’s long-run average total costs, including incurred and opportunity costs, at the level of actual output. Accordingly, the paper concludes that the jurisprudence is based on sound economic principles, as it aims to protect consumers from the abuse of a dominant position, without significantly influencing investment decisions by allowing investors to earn a return on their investments commensurate with the risks they take. The main problem in sanctioning excessive pricing is practical: the difficulty of measuring economic costs. The case law considers a less cumbersome alternative: comparing the defendant’s price with the price of the same or comparable products in more competitive markets, but with obvious homologation complexities. Safeguards have therefore been put in place to minimize the risk of false convictions, including considering a price to be excessive only if it significantly exceeds costs and allowing defendants to rebut the competition authority’s findings with objective data.

Journal of Competition Law & EconomicsVol. 21(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.