Comparative Evaluation Of Diffusion Weighted MRI And Ultrasonography In The Detection Of Breast Lesions

Objective: To compare the evaluation of diffusion weighted MRI and ultrasonography in the detection of breast lesions. Study design: It was a Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at at Islamabad Diagnostic Center, Faisalabad from July 2024 to December 2024. Material and Methods: A sample size of 97 patients presenting with breast lesions was selected, excluding those with previous breast implant. All patients underwent MRI using a 1.5 Tesla machine and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Results: This study included 97 patients with breast lesions to compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI). Based on US, 39 patients (40.2%) were classified as BI-RADS 2, 32 (33.0%) as BI-RADS 3, 6 (6.2%) as BI-RADS 4, 8 (8.2%) as BI-RADS 5, and 12 (12.4%) as BI-RADS 6. Among 33 malignant lesions, MRI accurately detected 31, yielding a sensitivity of 93.9%. MRI correctly identified 9 out of 10 malignant lesions in BI-RADS 3 (90.0% accuracy), 3 out of 4 in BI-RADS 4 (75.0% accuracy), and all malignant cases in BI-RADS 5 and 6 (100% accuracy). DWI detected 100% of vascular lesions as hyperintense and 91% of non-vascular lesions as hypointense, demonstrating high specificity for malignancy. MRI outperformed US in identifying malignancies, particularly for vascular lesions, whereas US was more accurate for benign lesion detection. These findings reinforce the complementary role of both modalities in breast lesion characterization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing and Allied Health
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37939/jnah.v3i01.115
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation Of Diffusion Weighted MRI And Ultrasonography In The Detection Of Breast Lesions

Syed Sarmad Bukhari, Ahmad Mehmood, K. H. M. Nazmul Hussain Nazir, Iqra Saeed et al.
Journal of Nursing and Allied Health
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Comparative Evaluation Of Diffusion Weighted MRI And Ultrasonography In The Detection Of Breast Lesions

Syed Sarmad Bukhari, Ahmad Mehmood, K. H. M. Nazmul Hussain Nazir, Iqra Saeed, Romana Ashraf, Sibghatullah
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the evaluation of diffusion weighted MRI and ultrasonography in the detection of breast lesions. Study design: It was a Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at at Islamabad Diagnostic Center, Faisalabad from July 2024 to December 2024. Material and Methods: A sample size of 97 patients presenting with breast lesions was selected, excluding those with previous breast implant. All patients underwent MRI using a 1.5 Tesla machine and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Results: This study included 97 patients with breast lesions to compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI). Based on US, 39 patients (40.2%) were classified as BI-RADS 2, 32 (33.0%) as BI-RADS 3, 6 (6.2%) as BI-RADS 4, 8 (8.2%) as BI-RADS 5, and 12 (12.4%) as BI-RADS 6. Among 33 malignant lesions, MRI accurately detected 31, yielding a sensitivity of 93.9%. MRI correctly identified 9 out of 10 malignant lesions in BI-RADS 3 (90.0% accuracy), 3 out of 4 in BI-RADS 4 (75.0% accuracy), and all malignant cases in BI-RADS 5 and 6 (100% accuracy). DWI detected 100% of vascular lesions as hyperintense and 91% of non-vascular lesions as hypointense, demonstrating high specificity for malignancy. MRI outperformed US in identifying malignancies, particularly for vascular lesions, whereas US was more accurate for benign lesion detection. These findings reinforce the complementary role of both modalities in breast lesion characterization.

Journal of Nursing and Allied HealthVol. 3(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.