Intranasal administration of a panreactive influenza antibody reveals Fc-independent mode of protection

Monoclonal antibodies have two core mechanisms of protection: an antibody's antigen-binding fragment (Fab) can bind and neutralize viral pathogens and its fragment crystallizable domain (Fc) catalyzes effector functions. We investigated the relative contribution of Fab- versus Fc-mediated mechanisms of protection through passive administration of distinct forms of the pan-reactive anti-influenza antibody CR9114. We demonstrated that the contribution of Fc-independent (Fab-dependent) versus Fc-dependent mechanisms of protection is defined by the route of administration. We used CR9114 variants (wild-type, two Fc-silenced variants, or the bivalent antigen-binding fragment F(ab')<sub>2</sub>), administered either intravenously or intranasally. We found that intravenously-administered CR9114 requires the Fc domain to provide potent, pre-exposure protection against influenza A and B viral challenge. In contrast, when CR9114 was administered locally to the nasal mucosa, the main mode of protection was provided by F(ab')<sub>2</sub>, and was largely Fc-independent. Importantly, this mode of protection following intranasal administration also applied to non-neutralized influenza B strains. Moreover, intranasal administration resulted in an increase in potency against influenza A/H1N1, A/H5N1, A/H3N2, B/Yam and B/Vic compared to intravenous administration up to 50-fold. These results shed new light on the application of monoclonal antibodies such as CR9114 to combat viral infection locally, and will help inform clinical strategies of pre-exposure prophylaxis. More fundamentally, this study uncovers distinct modes of protection for systemic versus intranasally-administered prophylactic antibodies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94314-5
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intranasal administration of a panreactive influenza antibody reveals Fc-independent mode of protection

Faez Amokrane Nait Mohamed, Larance Ronsard, Zoltán Magyarics, Kelly da Costa et al.
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Influenza Virus Research Studies
10.83
article

Intranasal administration of a panreactive influenza antibody reveals Fc-independent mode of protection

Faez Amokrane Nait Mohamed, Larance Ronsard, Zoltán Magyarics, Kelly da Costa, Carolyn M. Boudreau, Kanin Wichapong, Clarissa M. Koch, Anna L. Beukenhorst, Vintus Okonkwo, J. Klap, Helene Vietsch, Lisette A. H. M. Cornelissen, Stephanie Fischinger, Lindsey Adams, Martin H. Koldijk, Bertjan Ziere, Keira L. Rice, Nigel James Temperton, Jacopo Frallicciardi, Justin Crawford, Daniel Lingwood, Jaap Goudsmit, Babette A. de Jong, Boris Jülg, Caitlin McCarthy
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies have two core mechanisms of protection: an antibody's antigen-binding fragment (Fab) can bind and neutralize viral pathogens and its fragment crystallizable domain (Fc) catalyzes effector functions. We investigated the relative contribution of Fab- versus Fc-mediated mechanisms of protection through passive administration of distinct forms of the pan-reactive anti-influenza antibody CR9114. We demonstrated that the contribution of Fc-independent (Fab-dependent) versus Fc-dependent mechanisms of protection is defined by the route of administration. We used CR9114 variants (wild-type, two Fc-silenced variants, or the bivalent antigen-binding fragment F(ab')<sub>2</sub>), administered either intravenously or intranasally. We found that intravenously-administered CR9114 requires the Fc domain to provide potent, pre-exposure protection against influenza A and B viral challenge. In contrast, when CR9114 was administered locally to the nasal mucosa, the main mode of protection was provided by F(ab')<sub>2</sub>, and was largely Fc-independent. Importantly, this mode of protection following intranasal administration also applied to non-neutralized influenza B strains. Moreover, intranasal administration resulted in an increase in potency against influenza A/H1N1, A/H5N1, A/H3N2, B/Yam and B/Vic compared to intravenous administration up to 50-fold. These results shed new light on the application of monoclonal antibodies such as CR9114 to combat viral infection locally, and will help inform clinical strategies of pre-exposure prophylaxis. More fundamentally, this study uncovers distinct modes of protection for systemic versus intranasally-administered prophylactic antibodies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Leiden University (NL), Harvard University (US), Medway School of Pharmacy (GB), University of Kent (GB), Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard (US), Maastricht University (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University of Greenwich (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
10.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.