Comparison of Bobath Therapy and Motor Relearning Program (MRP) to Improve Motor Control of the Upper Limb in Stroke Patients

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Bobath Therapy and the Motor Relearning Program (MRP) in improving motor control of the upper limb in stroke patients. Study design: It was a Randomized Control Trial Study. Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at The Physiotherapy Clinic, RWP for 6 months from 1st July 2024 to 31st December 2024. Material and Methods: A total of 40 stroke patients with age between 50-75 years with upper limb motor deficits were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the Bobath Therapy group (n=20) or the Motor Relearning Program group (n=20). Both groups received 12 sessions of targeted therapy over four weeks. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Limb (FMA-UL), the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to assess motor function, movement quality, and spasticity. Pre- and post-intervention scores were compared using paired t-tests and between-group differences were analyzed using an independent t-test. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in motor control, as evidenced by increased FMA-UL and WMFT scores. However, the Bobath Therapy group demonstrated greater improvements in motor function (p<0.05) and movement quality compared to the MRP group. The MRP group showed a significant reduction in spasticity, but the Bobath group showed more substantial functional recovery (p<0.05).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing and Allied Health
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37939/jnah.v3i01.112
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Bobath Therapy and Motor Relearning Program (MRP) to Improve Motor Control of the Upper Limb in Stroke Patients

Muhammad Umar, Hiba Rashid, Sania Rizwan, Benish Ali
Journal of Nursing and Allied Health
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Comparison of Bobath Therapy and Motor Relearning Program (MRP) to Improve Motor Control of the Upper Limb in Stroke Patients

Muhammad Umar, Hiba Rashid, Sania Rizwan, Benish Ali
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Bobath Therapy and the Motor Relearning Program (MRP) in improving motor control of the upper limb in stroke patients. Study design: It was a Randomized Control Trial Study. Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at The Physiotherapy Clinic, RWP for 6 months from 1st July 2024 to 31st December 2024. Material and Methods: A total of 40 stroke patients with age between 50-75 years with upper limb motor deficits were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the Bobath Therapy group (n=20) or the Motor Relearning Program group (n=20). Both groups received 12 sessions of targeted therapy over four weeks. Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Limb (FMA-UL), the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to assess motor function, movement quality, and spasticity. Pre- and post-intervention scores were compared using paired t-tests and between-group differences were analyzed using an independent t-test. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in motor control, as evidenced by increased FMA-UL and WMFT scores. However, the Bobath Therapy group demonstrated greater improvements in motor function (p<0.05) and movement quality compared to the MRP group. The MRP group showed a significant reduction in spasticity, but the Bobath group showed more substantial functional recovery (p<0.05).

Journal of Nursing and Allied HealthVol. 3(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.