Legal Study of Fiduciary Guarantee Law in the Perspective of Islamic Law and Law No. 42 of 1999 Concerning Fiduciary Guarantee in Indonesia

The law of guarantees recognizes two types of guarantees, namely general guarantees and special guarantees, while special guarantees can still be distinguished into material guarantees and guarantees of people who guarantee debts. General guarantees and debt guarantees do not fully provide certainty regarding debt repayment, because the creditor does not have priority rights so that the creditor's position remains as a concurrent creditor against other creditors. Fiduciary guarantees are conventional products that are determined to provide protection for creditors, especially if the debtor defaults. Fiduciary guarantees that have not been able to be applied comprehensively to all financial institution systems in Indonesia, need to be conducted several studies, especially in the perspective of Islam and Law No. 42 of 1999 which uses the sharia financial system. The focus of the study that is used as the formulation of the problem is how is the law of fiduciary guarantees in the perspective of Islamic law and Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary guarantees in Indonesia. In this study, normative law is used, or it can be called library research. The results of the study show that the practice of implementing fiduciary in Indonesia has a very important position and must be fulfilled by financing service providers. Meanwhile, according to Islamic views, there is no fiduciary guarantee in the aspect of Islamic law, but matters concerning guarantees can be equated with rahn. Thus, in Islamic Financial Institutions, rahn is guided as a guarantee system in lending activities in accordance with Islamic law, this is based on the word of Allah QS. Al-Baqarah verse 283 and Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking. Guarantees of property are known in law, namely (1) guarantees in the form of pawns regulated in Articles 1150-1160 of the Civil Code, (2) mortgages regulated in Articles 1162-1178 of the Civil Code, (3) mortgage rights as regulated in Law No. 4 of 1996, and (4) fiduciary guarantee, which is regulated in Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary guarantee. Its implementation has not gone well, still experiencing obstacles: (a) Problems around the basis of trust where the submission of guarantees based on such trust is referred to as fiduciare eigendom overdracht, (b) The existence of intent as an unlawful act by one party, and (c) Related to Personal Guarantees where the recipient of the fiduciary does not directly own the object that is the fiduciary guarantee submitted by the fiduciary giver, so that the fiduciary guarantee is a guarantee theory.