Constructing surrogates for atomistic simulations via deep learning and generative large language models

Abstract Atomistic simulations offer insights into material behavior at the atomic level. However, they can be computationally intensive. In this paper, two deep learning models, deep symbolic optimization (DSO) and deep neural networks (DNN), and one generative large language model, GPT-4o, are employed to construct surrogates for atomistic simulations. Specifically, atomistic simulations are first performed to investigate the collapse of a nanovoid under hydrostatic pressure. We focus on the role of initial void radius and material characteristics, such as intrinsic and unstable stacking fault energies and surface energy (SE). We find that the critical pressure required for void collapse spans from 17.05 to 19.62 GPa, with the highest values corresponding to the maximum USFE. Additionally, an intermediate SE value (1068.13 $$\hbox {mJ/m}^2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>mJ/m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) minimizes the critical pressure. Based on the simulation results, surrogate models based on DSO, DNN, and GPT-4o are constructed, concluding that the SE affects the critical pressure the most. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-025-01571-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing surrogates for atomistic simulations via deep learning and generative large language models

Mehran Araghi, Kun Lü, Tang Gu, Shuozhi Xu et al.
2 citations
Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
article

Constructing surrogates for atomistic simulations via deep learning and generative large language models

Mehran Araghi, Kun Lü, Tang Gu, Shuozhi Xu, Mahshad Fani, Zejian Zhou, Xin Wang, William Chadwell, Nishad Tasnim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Atomistic simulations offer insights into material behavior at the atomic level. However, they can be computationally intensive. In this paper, two deep learning models, deep symbolic optimization (DSO) and deep neural networks (DNN), and one generative large language model, GPT-4o, are employed to construct surrogates for atomistic simulations. Specifically, atomistic simulations are first performed to investigate the collapse of a nanovoid under hydrostatic pressure. We focus on the role of initial void radius and material characteristics, such as intrinsic and unstable stacking fault energies and surface energy (SE). We find that the critical pressure required for void collapse spans from 17.05 to 19.62 GPa, with the highest values corresponding to the maximum USFE. Additionally, an intermediate SE value (1068.13 $$\hbox {mJ/m}^2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mtext>mJ/m</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) minimizes the critical pressure. Based on the simulation results, surrogate models based on DSO, DNN, and GPT-4o are constructed, concluding that the SE affects the critical pressure the most. Graphical abstract

Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sourcesVol. 41(1)
University of Wyoming (US), Institut Polytechnique des Sciences Avancées (FR), University of Oklahoma (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Oklahoma, University of California, Santa Barbara, Supercomputing Center for Education and Research, University of Oklahoma, Division of Materials Research, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.