Can Microinstrument Motion Metrics of Distance, Speed, and Acceleration Indicate Surgical Task Complexity? An AI-Driven Study

Objectifying the quality of microsurgical technique is both crucial and challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether microinstrument motion metricscan reflect the complexity of microsurgical tasks. The laboratory experiment involved 13 right-handed neurosurgeons tasked with using microsurgical scissors to cut a white thread at a spot marked by a purple dot under the microscope. Each participant completed the task under four consecutive conditions: with or without wrist stabilization on a support, both before and after muscle load. Using the promptable transformer model, we segmented microsurgical instruments from video recordings and extracted their skeletons and centers of mass. From the time series of the center of mass X and Y coordinates, we derived seven additional time series for velocity, acceleration, and the jerk along the X and Y axes, as well as the smoothness metric. We generated thirty-three statistical features for each time series using the feasts R package. These motion features were then compared pairwise across various tasks. Of the 1782 tests conducted, 164 (or 9.2%) revealed statistically significant differences in 66 motion features. Our results provide a proof-of-concept, showing that AI-derived microsurgical motion features can reflect the complexity of conditions encountered by the microsurgeon during surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250059
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Microinstrument Motion Metrics of Distance, Speed, and Acceleration Indicate Surgical Task Complexity? An AI-Driven Study

Oleg Pilipenko, Vasiliy Kostyumov, Gleb Danilov, Bulat Nutfullin et al.
Studies in health technology and informatics
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Can Microinstrument Motion Metrics of Distance, Speed, and Acceleration Indicate Surgical Task Complexity? An AI-Driven Study

Oleg Pilipenko, Vasiliy Kostyumov, Gleb Danilov, Bulat Nutfullin, Oleg Titov, Andrey Panteleyev, Eugene Ilyushin, D I Pitskhelauri, Andrey Bykanov, Sergey Trubetskoy
article en

Abstract

Objectifying the quality of microsurgical technique is both crucial and challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether microinstrument motion metricscan reflect the complexity of microsurgical tasks. The laboratory experiment involved 13 right-handed neurosurgeons tasked with using microsurgical scissors to cut a white thread at a spot marked by a purple dot under the microscope. Each participant completed the task under four consecutive conditions: with or without wrist stabilization on a support, both before and after muscle load. Using the promptable transformer model, we segmented microsurgical instruments from video recordings and extracted their skeletons and centers of mass. From the time series of the center of mass X and Y coordinates, we derived seven additional time series for velocity, acceleration, and the jerk along the X and Y axes, as well as the smoothness metric. We generated thirty-three statistical features for each time series using the feasts R package. These motion features were then compared pairwise across various tasks. Of the 1782 tests conducted, 164 (or 9.2%) revealed statistically significant differences in 66 motion features. Our results provide a proof-of-concept, showing that AI-derived microsurgical motion features can reflect the complexity of conditions encountered by the microsurgeon during surgery.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 323
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Russian Children's Clinical Hospital (RU), Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute (RU), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.