Colecistectomia laparoscópica versus aberta no tratamento da colecistite aguda: uma revisão sistemática

To evaluate, through systematic review, the available evidence comparing laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis, focusing on complications, hospital stay, conversion rate, and mortality. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies from 2018 to 2024 were selected in PubMed, Randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, comparative observational studies, and meta-analyses were included. Key outcomes were operative time, complications, hospital stay, conversion rate, and mortality. Seventeen studies were included. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays, faster recovery, and lower surgical site infection rates. Open cholecystectomy, on the other hand, was favored in severe inflammation, distorted anatomy, or intraoperative complications. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach in most cases of acute cholecystitis due to lower morbidity and faster recovery. The open approach remains relevant in high-risk orcomplex situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.914
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colecistectomia laparoscópica versus aberta no tratamento da colecistite aguda: uma revisão sistemática

Leonor Teixeira, Maria Eliane Alves Santana Gonçalves, Enzo Galinari Magalhães de Moura Faria, Vinícius Alves Barbosa
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Colecistectomia laparoscópica versus aberta no tratamento da colecistite aguda: uma revisão sistemática

Leonor Teixeira, Maria Eliane Alves Santana Gonçalves, Enzo Galinari Magalhães de Moura Faria, Vinícius Alves Barbosa
article en

Abstract

To evaluate, through systematic review, the available evidence comparing laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis, focusing on complications, hospital stay, conversion rate, and mortality. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies from 2018 to 2024 were selected in PubMed, Randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, comparative observational studies, and meta-analyses were included. Key outcomes were operative time, complications, hospital stay, conversion rate, and mortality. Seventeen studies were included. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with shorter hospital stays, faster recovery, and lower surgical site infection rates. Open cholecystectomy, on the other hand, was favored in severe inflammation, distorted anatomy, or intraoperative complications. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach in most cases of acute cholecystitis due to lower morbidity and faster recovery. The open approach remains relevant in high-risk orcomplex situations.

RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O SaberVol. 1(1)
Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte (BR), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.