Qualitative evaluation of failure mechanisms of aluminium 6061-T6 cold spray repairs

• Cold spray repairs show distinct failure modes at high and low pressure. • Adhesive and cohesive failures depend on processing parameters and bond strength. • SEM and DIC analyses revealed the failure characteristics. • Improved process specifications are needed to avoid unexpected failure modes. Cold spray is an emerging technology that shows great promise for the repair of civil aircraft components. However, certification of such repairs requires a comprehensive evaluation of repair performance, including a detailed assessment of repair strength and the associated failure mechanisms. The present research compared the failure mechanisms of cold-spray repaired specimens manufactured from aluminium alloy 6061-T6, produced using either a high-pressure or a low-pressure cold spray system, in tensile tests. Depending on the manufacturing process used, different failure mechanisms were observed, including cohesive failure of the deposit and failure of the deposit-substrate interface. The study suggests that failure in cold spray repair is driven by competing mechanisms, with the dominant mode influenced by both the applied load and the processing parameters, as well as the characteristics of the deposited material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Failure Analysis
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109581
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Material Properties and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative evaluation of failure mechanisms of aluminium 6061-T6 cold spray repairs

Konstantinos Stamoulis, Sudip Kundu
1 citations
Engineering Failure Analysis
Material Properties and Applications
2.93
article

Qualitative evaluation of failure mechanisms of aluminium 6061-T6 cold spray repairs

Konstantinos Stamoulis, Sudip Kundu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Cold spray repairs show distinct failure modes at high and low pressure. • Adhesive and cohesive failures depend on processing parameters and bond strength. • SEM and DIC analyses revealed the failure characteristics. • Improved process specifications are needed to avoid unexpected failure modes. Cold spray is an emerging technology that shows great promise for the repair of civil aircraft components. However, certification of such repairs requires a comprehensive evaluation of repair performance, including a detailed assessment of repair strength and the associated failure mechanisms. The present research compared the failure mechanisms of cold-spray repaired specimens manufactured from aluminium alloy 6061-T6, produced using either a high-pressure or a low-pressure cold spray system, in tensile tests. Depending on the manufacturing process used, different failure mechanisms were observed, including cohesive failure of the deposit and failure of the deposit-substrate interface. The study suggests that failure in cold spray repair is driven by competing mechanisms, with the dominant mode influenced by both the applied load and the processing parameters, as well as the characteristics of the deposited material.

Engineering Failure AnalysisVol. 175
Amsterdam University College (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Material Properties and Applications
2.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Qualitative evaluation of failure mechanisms of aluminium 6061-T6 cold spray repairs — Konstantinos Stamoulis, Sudip Kundu · Engineering Failure Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS