CLIPping Imbalances: A Novel Evaluation Baseline and PEARL Dataset for Pedestrian Attribute Recognition
Pedestrian Attribute Recognition (PAR) serves as a fun-damental task in computer vision and is crucial for upgradign security systems. It helps in precisely identifying and characterizing various attributes of pedestrians. However, current PAR datasets have certain issues in representing a wide range of attributes correctly, which makes the ex-isting PAR methods less effective in real-world scenarios. Addressing this limitation, this paper introduces PEARL, a comprehensive dataset comprising of diverse pedestrian images annotated with 146 attributes. These samples have been sourced from surveillance videos across twelve coun-tries. This paper also formulates an image-based PAR using language-image fusion strategy and utilizes CLIP as a new evaluation baseline. Specifically, we leverage textual infor-mation by transforming sets of attributes into meaningful sentences. Addressing the inherent data imbalance in PAR, we provide three types of prompt settings to optimize the training of the CLIP model. Our evaluation encompasses a thorough assessment of the proposed baseline model across various datasets, including PEARL dataset as well as estab-lished PAR benchmarks such as PA100K, RAP, and PETA.
Authors
- Debi Prosad Dogra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3904-732X)
- Ig-Jae Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-7047)
- Heeseung Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3223-1885)
- K. Venkataravana Nayak
- Kamalakar Vijay Thakare (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-4126)
- Hyungjoo Jung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-8649)
- Lalit Lohani
Institutions
- Korean Association Of Science and Technology Studies (KR)
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar (IN)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-02-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00690
- Primary Topic
- Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00