Mapping near-real-time soil moisture dynamics over Tasmania with transfer learning

Abstract. Soil moisture, an essential parameter for hydroclimatic studies, exhibits considerable spatial and temporal variability, which complicates its mapping at high spatiotemporal resolutions. Although current remote sensing products offer global estimates of soil moisture at fine temporal resolutions, they do so at a coarse spatial resolution. Deep learning (DL) techniques have recently been employed to produce high-resolution maps of various soil properties; however, these methods require substantial training data. This study sought to map daily soil moisture across Tasmania, Australia, at an 80 m resolution using a limited set of training data. We assessed three modeling strategies: DL models calibrated using an Australian dataset (51 411 observation points), models calibrated using the Tasmanian dataset (9825 observation points), and a transfer learning technique that transferred information from the Australian models to Tasmania using region-specific data. We also evaluated two DL approaches, i.e., multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM). The models included the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) dataset, weather data, an elevation map, land cover, and multilevel soil property maps as inputs to generate soil moisture at the surface (0–30 cm) and subsurface (30–60 cm) layers. Results showed that (1) models calibrated from the Australian dataset performed worse than Tasmanian models regardless of the type of DL approaches; (2) Tasmanian models, calibrated solely using local data, resulted in shortcomings in predicting soil moisture; and (3) transfer learning exhibited remarkable performance improvements (error reductions of up to 45 % and a 50 % increase in correlation) and resolved the drawbacks of the two previous models. The LSTM models with transfer learning had the highest overall performance with an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.07 m3 m−3 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.77 across stations for the surface layer as well as MAE=0.07m3m-3 and r=0.69 for the subsurface layer. The fine-resolution soil moisture maps captured the detailed landscape variation as well as temporal variation according to four distinct seasons in Tasmania. The models were then applied to generate daily soil moisture maps of Tasmania, integrated into a near-real-time monitoring system to assist agricultural decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOIL
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-287-2025
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping near-real-time soil moisture dynamics over Tasmania with transfer learning

Marliana Tri Widyastuti, Darren Kidd, Mathew Webb, Budiman Minasny et al.
SOIL
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
article

Mapping near-real-time soil moisture dynamics over Tasmania with transfer learning

Marliana Tri Widyastuti, Darren Kidd, Mathew Webb, Budiman Minasny, Muh Taufik, José Padarian
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Soil moisture, an essential parameter for hydroclimatic studies, exhibits considerable spatial and temporal variability, which complicates its mapping at high spatiotemporal resolutions. Although current remote sensing products offer global estimates of soil moisture at fine temporal resolutions, they do so at a coarse spatial resolution. Deep learning (DL) techniques have recently been employed to produce high-resolution maps of various soil properties; however, these methods require substantial training data. This study sought to map daily soil moisture across Tasmania, Australia, at an 80 m resolution using a limited set of training data. We assessed three modeling strategies: DL models calibrated using an Australian dataset (51 411 observation points), models calibrated using the Tasmanian dataset (9825 observation points), and a transfer learning technique that transferred information from the Australian models to Tasmania using region-specific data. We also evaluated two DL approaches, i.e., multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM). The models included the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) dataset, weather data, an elevation map, land cover, and multilevel soil property maps as inputs to generate soil moisture at the surface (0–30 cm) and subsurface (30–60 cm) layers. Results showed that (1) models calibrated from the Australian dataset performed worse than Tasmanian models regardless of the type of DL approaches; (2) Tasmanian models, calibrated solely using local data, resulted in shortcomings in predicting soil moisture; and (3) transfer learning exhibited remarkable performance improvements (error reductions of up to 45 % and a 50 % increase in correlation) and resolved the drawbacks of the two previous models. The LSTM models with transfer learning had the highest overall performance with an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.07 m3 m−3 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.77 across stations for the surface layer as well as MAE=0.07m3m-3 and r=0.69 for the subsurface layer. The fine-resolution soil moisture maps captured the detailed landscape variation as well as temporal variation according to four distinct seasons in Tasmania. The models were then applied to generate daily soil moisture maps of Tasmania, integrated into a near-real-time monitoring system to assist agricultural decision-making.

SOILVol. 11(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), IPB University (ID), Meteorological, Climatological, And Geophysical Agency (ID), Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (AU), Sydney Institute of Marine Science (AU)
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.