DiL: An Explainable and Practical Metric for Abnormal Uncertainty in Object Detection

Although object detection models are widely used, their predictive performance has been shown to deteriorate when faced with abnormal scenes. Such abnormalities can occur naturally (by partially occluded or out-of-distribution objects) or deliberately (in the case of an adversarial attack). Existing uncertainty quantification methods, such as object detection evaluation metrics and label-uncertainty quantification techniques, do not consider the abnormalities' effect on the model's internal decision-making process. Furthermore, practical methods that consider the effects of abnormalities (such as abnormality detection and mitigation) are designed to deal with one type of abnormality. We present distinctive localization (DiL), an unsupervised, practical and explainable metric that quantitatively interprets any type of abnormality and can be leveraged for preventive purposes. By utilizing XAI techniques (saliency maps), DiL maps the objectness of a given scene and captures the model's inner uncertainty regarding the identified (and missed) objects. DiL was evaluated across nine use cases, including partially occluded and out-of-distribution objects, as well as adversarial patches, in both physical and digital spaces, on benchmark datasets, and our newly E-PO dataset (generated with DALL-E 2). Our results show that DiL: i) successfully interprets and quantifies an abnormality's effect on the model's decision-making process, regardless of the abnormality type; and ii) can be leveraged to detect and mitigate this effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00249
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DiL: An Explainable and Practical Metric for Abnormal Uncertainty in Object Detection

Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici, Amit Giloni, Ikuya Morikawa et al.
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

DiL: An Explainable and Practical Metric for Abnormal Uncertainty in Object Detection

Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici, Amit Giloni, Ikuya Morikawa, Omer Hofman, Toshiya Shimizu
article en

Abstract

Although object detection models are widely used, their predictive performance has been shown to deteriorate when faced with abnormal scenes. Such abnormalities can occur naturally (by partially occluded or out-of-distribution objects) or deliberately (in the case of an adversarial attack). Existing uncertainty quantification methods, such as object detection evaluation metrics and label-uncertainty quantification techniques, do not consider the abnormalities' effect on the model's internal decision-making process. Furthermore, practical methods that consider the effects of abnormalities (such as abnormality detection and mitigation) are designed to deal with one type of abnormality. We present distinctive localization (DiL), an unsupervised, practical and explainable metric that quantitatively interprets any type of abnormality and can be leveraged for preventive purposes. By utilizing XAI techniques (saliency maps), DiL maps the objectness of a given scene and captures the model's inner uncertainty regarding the identified (and missed) objects. DiL was evaluated across nine use cases, including partially occluded and out-of-distribution objects, as well as adversarial patches, in both physical and digital spaces, on benchmark datasets, and our newly E-PO dataset (generated with DALL-E 2). Our results show that DiL: i) successfully interprets and quantifies an abnormality's effect on the model's decision-making process, regardless of the abnormality type; and ii) can be leveraged to detect and mitigate this effect.

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Fujitsu (China) (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.