Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection

Deep neural networks are likely to learn unintended spurious correlations between training data and labels when dealing with biased data, potentially limiting the generalization to unseen samples not presenting the same bias. In this context, model debiasing approaches can be de-vised aiming at reducing the model's dependency on such unwanted correlations, either leveraging the knowledge of bias information or not. In this work, we focus on the latter and more realistic scenario, showing the importance of accurately predicting the bias-conflicting and bias-aligned samples to obtain compelling performance in bias mitigation. On this ground, we propose to conceive the problem of model bias from an out-of-distribution perspective, intro-ducing a new bias identification method based on anomaly detection. We claim that when data is mostly biased, bias-conflicting samples can be regarded as outliers with respect to the bias-aligned distribution in the feature space of a bi-ased model, thus allowing for precisely detecting them with an anomaly detection method. Coupling the proposed bias identification approach with bias-conflicting data upsampling and augmentation in a two-step strategy, we reach state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real benchmark datasets. Ultimately, our proposed approach shows that the data bias issue does not necessarily require complex debiasing methods, given that an accurate bias identification procedure is defined. Source code is available at https://github.com/Malga-Vision/MoDAD

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00253
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection

Vittorio Murino, Francesca Odone, Vito Paolo Pastore, Massimiliano Ciranni et al.
2 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
4.96
article

Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection

Vittorio Murino, Francesca Odone, Vito Paolo Pastore, Massimiliano Ciranni, Davide Marinelli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Deep neural networks are likely to learn unintended spurious correlations between training data and labels when dealing with biased data, potentially limiting the generalization to unseen samples not presenting the same bias. In this context, model debiasing approaches can be de-vised aiming at reducing the model's dependency on such unwanted correlations, either leveraging the knowledge of bias information or not. In this work, we focus on the latter and more realistic scenario, showing the importance of accurately predicting the bias-conflicting and bias-aligned samples to obtain compelling performance in bias mitigation. On this ground, we propose to conceive the problem of model bias from an out-of-distribution perspective, intro-ducing a new bias identification method based on anomaly detection. We claim that when data is mostly biased, bias-conflicting samples can be regarded as outliers with respect to the bias-aligned distribution in the feature space of a bi-ased model, thus allowing for precisely detecting them with an anomaly detection method. Coupling the proposed bias identification approach with bias-conflicting data upsampling and augmentation in a two-step strategy, we reach state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real benchmark datasets. Ultimately, our proposed approach shows that the data bias issue does not necessarily require complex debiasing methods, given that an accurate bias identification procedure is defined. Source code is available at https://github.com/Malga-Vision/MoDAD

University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.