Language(s), Biopolitics, and the Problem of the (Human) Animal in Joseph D’Lacey’s <i>MEAT</i> (2008) and Vincent Message’s <i>Défaite des maîtres et possesseurs</i> (2016)

This article explores Joseph D’Lacey’s MEAT (2008) and Vincent Message’s Défaite des maîtres et possesseurs (2016) through the prism of biopolitics and language. In the worlds of both novels, humans take the positions of nonhuman animals in industrial animal agriculture—a speculative technique that has been praised by the critical literature. Drawing on Cary Wolfe (2013) and Eva Meijer (2019), this article brings nuance to these discussions: while the novels call into question anthropocentric definitions of language and the human/nonhuman binary, the familiarity of the (human) animals means that the novels fail to reimagine anthropocentric conceptions of animality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Extrapolation
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2025.4
Primary Topic
Narrative Theory and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language(s), Biopolitics, and the Problem of the (Human) Animal in Joseph D’Lacey’s MEAT (2008) and Vincent Message’s Défaite des maîtres et possesseurs (2016)

Phoebe Chetwynd
Extrapolation
Narrative Theory and Analysis
article

Language(s), Biopolitics, and the Problem of the (Human) Animal in Joseph D’Lacey’s MEAT (2008) and Vincent Message’s Défaite des maîtres et possesseurs (2016)

Phoebe Chetwynd
article en

Abstract

This article explores Joseph D’Lacey’s MEAT (2008) and Vincent Message’s Défaite des maîtres et possesseurs (2016) through the prism of biopolitics and language. In the worlds of both novels, humans take the positions of nonhuman animals in industrial animal agriculture—a speculative technique that has been praised by the critical literature. Drawing on Cary Wolfe (2013) and Eva Meijer (2019), this article brings nuance to these discussions: while the novels call into question anthropocentric definitions of language and the human/nonhuman binary, the familiarity of the (human) animals means that the novels fail to reimagine anthropocentric conceptions of animality.

ExtrapolationVol. 66(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Narrative Theory and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Language(s), Biopolitics, and the Problem of the (Human) Animal in Joseph D’Lacey’s <i>MEAT</i> (2008) and Vincent Message’s <i>Défaite des maîtres et possesseurs</i> (2016) — Phoebe Chetwynd · Extrapolation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS