Fundamental Trade-Offs in the Robustness of Biological Systems with Feedback Regulation

Natural biological systems use feedback regulation to effectively respond and adapt to their changing environment. Even though in engineered systems we understand how accurate feedback can be depending on the electronic or mechanical parts that it is implemented with, we largely lack a similar theoretical framework to study feedback regulation in biological systems. Specifically, it is not fully understood or quantified how accurate or robust the implementation of biological feedback actually is. In this paper, we study the sensitivity of biological feedback to variations in biochemical parameters using five example circuits: positive autoregulation, negative autoregulation, double-positive feedback, positive-negative feedback, and double-negative feedback (the toggle switch). We find that some of these examples of biological feedback are subjected to fundamental performance trade-offs, and we propose multi-objective optimization as a framework to study their properties. The impact of this work is to improve robust circuit design for synthetic biology and to improve our understanding of feedback for systems biology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.4c00704
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamental Trade-Offs in the Robustness of Biological Systems with Feedback Regulation

Ania-Ariadna Baetica, Nguyen Tran, An Nguyen, Tasfia Wasima Rahman
2 citations
ACS Synthetic Biology
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
1.61
article

Fundamental Trade-Offs in the Robustness of Biological Systems with Feedback Regulation

Ania-Ariadna Baetica, Nguyen Tran, An Nguyen, Tasfia Wasima Rahman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Natural biological systems use feedback regulation to effectively respond and adapt to their changing environment. Even though in engineered systems we understand how accurate feedback can be depending on the electronic or mechanical parts that it is implemented with, we largely lack a similar theoretical framework to study feedback regulation in biological systems. Specifically, it is not fully understood or quantified how accurate or robust the implementation of biological feedback actually is. In this paper, we study the sensitivity of biological feedback to variations in biochemical parameters using five example circuits: positive autoregulation, negative autoregulation, double-positive feedback, positive-negative feedback, and double-negative feedback (the toggle switch). We find that some of these examples of biological feedback are subjected to fundamental performance trade-offs, and we propose multi-objective optimization as a framework to study their properties. The impact of this work is to improve robust circuit design for synthetic biology and to improve our understanding of feedback for systems biology.

ACS Synthetic BiologyVol. 14(4)
Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.