Development of Bounce-Time-Based Orbit-Following Monte-Carlo Code

We developed a bounce-time (BT)-based orbit-following Monte-Carlo code as an extension of the OFMC code in QST. In the BT-based method, we take a bounce time as a time step of the orbit following. The time step is ~ 100 times longer than the gyro period which is a typical time step for the conventional guiding-center (GC) method. In the BT-based method, an accurate and simple estimation of a poloidal projection of the bounce orbit and a staying time are essential. An expression for the orbit gives us an orbit shape by a small calculation with the difference of less than 1% of the minor radius, compared with the GC method with the same fast ion parameters. And an approximate expression for the staying time also gives us the staying time with a good accuracy for our purpose. We can see a good agreement between calculation results for the BT-based method and those for the GC method in an axisymmetric condition. The BT-based method is 70–140 times faster than the GC method, depending on the slowing-down time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plasma and Fusion Research
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1585/pfr.20.1403017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Bounce-Time-Based Orbit-Following Monte-Carlo Code

Yiming TIAN, Yu-Ting Lin, Masanobu Suzuki, A. Bierwage et al.
1 citations
Plasma and Fusion Research
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
4.99
article

Development of Bounce-Time-Based Orbit-Following Monte-Carlo Code

Yiming TIAN, Yu-Ting Lin, Masanobu Suzuki, A. Bierwage, K. Tani, S. Nishimura, S. Sumida, K. Shinohara, N. Tsujii, A. Ejiri, Fumiya ADACHI, Yi Peng, Nobuhiko Hayashi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We developed a bounce-time (BT)-based orbit-following Monte-Carlo code as an extension of the OFMC code in QST. In the BT-based method, we take a bounce time as a time step of the orbit following. The time step is ~ 100 times longer than the gyro period which is a typical time step for the conventional guiding-center (GC) method. In the BT-based method, an accurate and simple estimation of a poloidal projection of the bounce orbit and a staying time are essential. An expression for the orbit gives us an orbit shape by a small calculation with the difference of less than 1% of the minor radius, compared with the GC method with the same fast ion parameters. And an approximate expression for the staying time also gives us the staying time with a good accuracy for our purpose. We can see a good agreement between calculation results for the BT-based method and those for the GC method in an axisymmetric condition. The BT-based method is 70–140 times faster than the GC method, depending on the slowing-down time.

Plasma and Fusion ResearchVol. 20(0)
National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP), Fusion Academy (US), The University of Tokyo (JP), Oceaneering International (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.