Chinese generative AI models (DeepSeek and Qwen) rival ChatGPT-4 in ophthalmology queries with excellent performance in Arabic and English

The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) has ushered in a new era of digital medical consultations, with patients turning to AI-driven tools for guidance. The emergence of Chinese-developed genAI models such as DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen-2.5 presented a challenge to the dominance of OpenAI's ChatGPT. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of Chinese genAI models against ChatGPT-40 and to assess disparities in performance across English and Arabic. Following the METRICS checklist for genAI evaluation, Qwen-2.5, DeepSeek-R1, and ChatGPT-40 were assessed for completeness, accuracy, and relevance using the CLEAR tool in common patient ophthalmology queries. In English, Qwen-2.5 demonstrated the highest overall performance (CLEAR score: 4.43 ± 0.28), outperforming both DeepSeek-R1 (4.3 ± 0.43) and ChatGPT-40 (4.14 ± 0.41), with <i>p</i> = 0.002. A similar hierarchy emerged in Arabic, with Qwen-2.5 again leading (4.40 ± 0.29), followed by DeepSeek-R1 (4.20 ± 0.49) and ChatGPT-40 (4.14 ± 0.41), with <i>p</i> = 0.007. Each tested genAI model exhibited near-identical performance across the two languages, with ChatGPT-40 demonstrating the most balanced linguistic capabilities (<i>p</i> = 0.957), while Qwen-2.5 and DeepSeek-R1 showed a marginal superiority for English. An in-depth examination of genAI performance across key CLEAR components revealed that Qwen-2.5 consistently excelled in content completeness, factual accuracy, and relevance in both English and Arabic, setting a new benchmark for genAI in medical inquiries. Despite minor linguistic disparities, all three models exhibited robust multilingual capabilities, challenging the long-held assumption that genAI is inherently biased toward English. These findings highlight the evolving nature of AI-driven medical assistance, with Chinese genAI models being able to rival or even surpass ChatGPT-40 in ophthalmology-related queries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Narra J
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v5i1.2371
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese generative AI models (DeepSeek and Qwen) rival ChatGPT-4 in ophthalmology queries with excellent performance in Arabic and English

Jan Egger, Mohammed Sallam, Maad M. Mıjwıl, Ahmad Samed Al‐Adwan et al.
15 citations
Narra J
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.81
article

Chinese generative AI models (DeepSeek and Qwen) rival ChatGPT-4 in ophthalmology queries with excellent performance in Arabic and English

Jan Egger, Mohammed Sallam, Maad M. Mıjwıl, Ahmad Samed Al‐Adwan, Malik Sallam, Amwaj Al‐Farajat, Israa M Alasfoor, Shahad W Khalid, Rand I Al-Mulla, Reem Zahrawi
article en
15 citations

Abstract

The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) has ushered in a new era of digital medical consultations, with patients turning to AI-driven tools for guidance. The emergence of Chinese-developed genAI models such as DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen-2.5 presented a challenge to the dominance of OpenAI's ChatGPT. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of Chinese genAI models against ChatGPT-40 and to assess disparities in performance across English and Arabic. Following the METRICS checklist for genAI evaluation, Qwen-2.5, DeepSeek-R1, and ChatGPT-40 were assessed for completeness, accuracy, and relevance using the CLEAR tool in common patient ophthalmology queries. In English, Qwen-2.5 demonstrated the highest overall performance (CLEAR score: 4.43 ± 0.28), outperforming both DeepSeek-R1 (4.3 ± 0.43) and ChatGPT-40 (4.14 ± 0.41), with <i>p</i> = 0.002. A similar hierarchy emerged in Arabic, with Qwen-2.5 again leading (4.40 ± 0.29), followed by DeepSeek-R1 (4.20 ± 0.49) and ChatGPT-40 (4.14 ± 0.41), with <i>p</i> = 0.007. Each tested genAI model exhibited near-identical performance across the two languages, with ChatGPT-40 demonstrating the most balanced linguistic capabilities (<i>p</i> = 0.957), while Qwen-2.5 and DeepSeek-R1 showed a marginal superiority for English. An in-depth examination of genAI performance across key CLEAR components revealed that Qwen-2.5 consistently excelled in content completeness, factual accuracy, and relevance in both English and Arabic, setting a new benchmark for genAI in medical inquiries. Despite minor linguistic disparities, all three models exhibited robust multilingual capabilities, challenging the long-held assumption that genAI is inherently biased toward English. These findings highlight the evolving nature of AI-driven medical assistance, with Chinese genAI models being able to rival or even surpass ChatGPT-40 in ophthalmology-related queries.

Narra JVol. 5(1)
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), University of Jordan (JO), American Jewish University (US), Jordan Hospital (JO), Baghdad College of Economic Sciences University (IQ), Iraqi University (IQ), Specialty Hospital, Jordan (JO), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (AE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Virtual Reality Medical Center (US), Mediclinic City Hospital (AE), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.