A pecking order of household finance

Abstract How do households cope with economic shocks? In this article, I provide empirical evidence and theoretical grounding for a pecking order of coping methods using data from the UK Understanding Society COVID-19 Study. I find that there is a typical household finance ordering of responses to income loss. Almost two-thirds (65 per cent) of households first reduce spending then these households typically proceed to draw down savings (59 per cent) and their most common next response is relying on family and friends (21 per cent). Deviations from this ordering occur because certain coping methods are often unavailable—those households not reducing spending are already struggling and those without savings have nothing to drawdown. Receiving financial assistance from family and friends is also more common than some authors suggest. Lastly, I find that the costs of informal borrowing are influenced by plausible social factors. My results are informative for policies to promote resilience during crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Economic Papers
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaf012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A pecking order of household finance

Declan French
2 citations
Oxford Economic Papers
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
7.73
article

A pecking order of household finance

Declan French
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract How do households cope with economic shocks? In this article, I provide empirical evidence and theoretical grounding for a pecking order of coping methods using data from the UK Understanding Society COVID-19 Study. I find that there is a typical household finance ordering of responses to income loss. Almost two-thirds (65 per cent) of households first reduce spending then these households typically proceed to draw down savings (59 per cent) and their most common next response is relying on family and friends (21 per cent). Deviations from this ordering occur because certain coping methods are often unavailable—those households not reducing spending are already struggling and those without savings have nothing to drawdown. Receiving financial assistance from family and friends is also more common than some authors suggest. Lastly, I find that the costs of informal borrowing are influenced by plausible social factors. My results are informative for policies to promote resilience during crises.

Oxford Economic PapersVol. 77(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.