Driving among autonomous vehicles: The effect of initial trust and driving style on driving behaviors

• Promoting trust in autonomous vehicles leads conventional vehicle drivers to report more deliberate unsafe behaviors. • Conventional vehicle drivers might report more hostile or aggressive behaviors toward autonomous vehicles. • Individual differences between drivers such as “angry and hostile” levels relate to different unsafe behaviors. Although autonomous vehicles (AVs) are believed to reduce road accidents, they can be involved in accidents partly due to Conventional Vehicles (CVs) drivers’ erroneous expectations that affect their risk-taking behaviors, such as following the AVs too closely and/or at an unsafe speed. In this article, the main objective is to propose a first exploratory study on how our expectations as drivers of conventional vehicles can shape our driving in the presence of autonomous vehicles. We investigated the role of initial trust in AVs on CV drivers’ behaviors toward AVs. Ninety-five participants were confronted with trust-promoting or trust-lowering video clips of AVs driving. Individual driving behaviors were then assessed using a modified version of the Driving Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) that distinguishes between lapses, errors, and ordinary and emotional violations. We also collected respondents’ self-reported driving styles with the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). The results showed that the trust-promoted group reported more deliberate ordinary and emotional violations than the trust-lowered group. These ordinary violations, due to their potential link to road accidents, highlight the importance of fostering realistic expectations about AVs. The emotional violations were not initially anticipated but were attributed to the unfamiliar and potentially frustrating behaviors exhibited by AVs. Finally, we emphasize the importance of trust calibration of road users toward autonomous vehicles to ensure road safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.023
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving among autonomous vehicles: The effect of initial trust and driving style on driving behaviors

Jordan Navarro, Hélène Unrein, Julien Cegarra, Jean‐Marc André et al.
7 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
17.07
article

Driving among autonomous vehicles: The effect of initial trust and driving style on driving behaviors

Jordan Navarro, Hélène Unrein, Julien Cegarra, Jean‐Marc André, Oriane Mouton
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Promoting trust in autonomous vehicles leads conventional vehicle drivers to report more deliberate unsafe behaviors. • Conventional vehicle drivers might report more hostile or aggressive behaviors toward autonomous vehicles. • Individual differences between drivers such as “angry and hostile” levels relate to different unsafe behaviors. Although autonomous vehicles (AVs) are believed to reduce road accidents, they can be involved in accidents partly due to Conventional Vehicles (CVs) drivers’ erroneous expectations that affect their risk-taking behaviors, such as following the AVs too closely and/or at an unsafe speed. In this article, the main objective is to propose a first exploratory study on how our expectations as drivers of conventional vehicles can shape our driving in the presence of autonomous vehicles. We investigated the role of initial trust in AVs on CV drivers’ behaviors toward AVs. Ninety-five participants were confronted with trust-promoting or trust-lowering video clips of AVs driving. Individual driving behaviors were then assessed using a modified version of the Driving Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) that distinguishes between lapses, errors, and ordinary and emotional violations. We also collected respondents’ self-reported driving styles with the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). The results showed that the trust-promoted group reported more deliberate ordinary and emotional violations than the trust-lowered group. These ordinary violations, due to their potential link to road accidents, highlight the importance of fostering realistic expectations about AVs. The emotional violations were not initially anticipated but were attributed to the unfamiliar and potentially frustrating behaviors exhibited by AVs. Finally, we emphasize the importance of trust calibration of road users toward autonomous vehicles to ensure road safety.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 112
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Laboratoire d’Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (FR), Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
17.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.