Mapping the Epidemiologic Features of Endotracheal Tube Obstruction

<h3>Background</h3> Endotracheal tube blockages (ETBs) are a common yet often overlooked cause of weaning failure, ventilator dyssynchrony, and hypoxia in the ICU, with limited studies on their prevalence, clinical factors, and outcomes. <h3>Research Question</h3> What are the incidence, risk factors, and associated clinical and ventilator factors of ETBs in ventilated patients in the ICU? <h3>Study Design and Methods</h3> We assessed 369 endotracheal tubes (ETTs) of mechanically ventilated patients after extubation. This prospective observational study was conducted at the tertiary cardiothoracic ICUs (CICUs) and medical ICUs (MICUs) of Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, India. Tubes were inspected visually and were cut at the point of maximum blockage, and cross-sectional images captured with a 12-megapixel camera were analyzed for ETB percentage using the SketchAndCalc algorithm. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 369 ETTs assessed, ETBs were categorized as showing low (0%-9%), moderate (10%-49%), and severe (> 50%) occlusion. In the CICU, severe ETBs was observed in < 2% of patients, compared with 4% of patients in the MICU, whereas moderate ETBs were present in 27.9% of patients in the CICU and 16.5% of patients in the MICU. On univariable analysis, suction type (β = 9.62 [95% CI, 5.27-13.98]; <i>P</i> < .01), peak pressure (P<sub>peak</sub>; β = 1.73 [95% CI, 1.38-2.08]; <i>P</i> < .01), coagulopathy (β = 9.42 [95% CI, 4.22-14.62]; <i>P</i> < .01), and ICU type (β = 9.62 [95% CI, 5.28-13.96]; <i>P</i> < .01) were statistically significant. Multivariable regression analysis showed only P<sub>peak</sub> (β = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.28-2.02]; <i>P</i> < .01), coagulopathy (β = 8.02 [95% CI, 3.26-12.79]; <i>P</i> < .01) and larger number of days receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (β = 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.03]; <i>P</i> < .01) to be significant factors associated with ETB percentage. <h3>Interpretation</h3> Moderate ETB was more prevalent in patients in the ICU, with significant factors including coagulopathy, closed suction practice, and mechanical ventilation duration. P<sub>peak</sub> alarms lacked clinical impact, despite statistical significance. <h3>Clinical Trial Registry</h3> Clinical Trial Registry-India; No.: CTRI/2023/10/058184; URL: www.ctri.nic.in

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Critical Care
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100156
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Epidemiologic Features of Endotracheal Tube Obstruction

Manthena V. S. Varma, John Basmaji, Sheela Ramamoorthy, Kallol Saha et al.
1 citations
CHEST Critical Care
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
2.19
article

Mapping the Epidemiologic Features of Endotracheal Tube Obstruction

Manthena V. S. Varma, John Basmaji, Sheela Ramamoorthy, Kallol Saha, Ross Prager, Nicolás Orozco, Arjun Alva, Vimal Bhardwaj, Abhishek Samprathi, Jose Chacko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Endotracheal tube blockages (ETBs) are a common yet often overlooked cause of weaning failure, ventilator dyssynchrony, and hypoxia in the ICU, with limited studies on their prevalence, clinical factors, and outcomes. <h3>Research Question</h3> What are the incidence, risk factors, and associated clinical and ventilator factors of ETBs in ventilated patients in the ICU? <h3>Study Design and Methods</h3> We assessed 369 endotracheal tubes (ETTs) of mechanically ventilated patients after extubation. This prospective observational study was conducted at the tertiary cardiothoracic ICUs (CICUs) and medical ICUs (MICUs) of Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, India. Tubes were inspected visually and were cut at the point of maximum blockage, and cross-sectional images captured with a 12-megapixel camera were analyzed for ETB percentage using the SketchAndCalc algorithm. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 369 ETTs assessed, ETBs were categorized as showing low (0%-9%), moderate (10%-49%), and severe (> 50%) occlusion. In the CICU, severe ETBs was observed in < 2% of patients, compared with 4% of patients in the MICU, whereas moderate ETBs were present in 27.9% of patients in the CICU and 16.5% of patients in the MICU. On univariable analysis, suction type (β = 9.62 [95% CI, 5.27-13.98]; <i>P</i> < .01), peak pressure (P<sub>peak</sub>; β = 1.73 [95% CI, 1.38-2.08]; <i>P</i> < .01), coagulopathy (β = 9.42 [95% CI, 4.22-14.62]; <i>P</i> < .01), and ICU type (β = 9.62 [95% CI, 5.28-13.96]; <i>P</i> < .01) were statistically significant. Multivariable regression analysis showed only P<sub>peak</sub> (β = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.28-2.02]; <i>P</i> < .01), coagulopathy (β = 8.02 [95% CI, 3.26-12.79]; <i>P</i> < .01) and larger number of days receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (β = 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.03]; <i>P</i> < .01) to be significant factors associated with ETB percentage. <h3>Interpretation</h3> Moderate ETB was more prevalent in patients in the ICU, with significant factors including coagulopathy, closed suction practice, and mechanical ventilation duration. P<sub>peak</sub> alarms lacked clinical impact, despite statistical significance. <h3>Clinical Trial Registry</h3> Clinical Trial Registry-India; No.: CTRI/2023/10/058184; URL: www.ctri.nic.in

CHEST Critical CareVol. 3(2)
Western University (CA), Narayana Health (IN), Fundación Valle del Lili (CO), Medical Technologies (Czechia) (CZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.