On the Phase Transition of the Euclidean Travelling Salesman Problem with Time Windows

Algorithms are often evaluated on randomly generated instances to study scale-up properties with respect to features such as the size, for example. Also, machine learning based approaches often train models on randomly generated instances as they need large sets of training instances. In this paper, we consider the Euclidean Travelling Salesman Problem with Time Windows (TSPTW), and we study the impact of parameters used to randomly generate TSPTW instances on hardness and feasibility. We first consider the decision version of the problem, where feasibility depends on start and end times of time windows. We introduce two parameters, α and β, for controlling the tightness of the time horizon and the time windows. We show that instance hardness is related to a phase transition phenomenon: as we increase α and β, we pass from an unfeasible region (where almost all generated instances have no solution) to a feasible region (where almost all generated instances have solutions), and the hardest instances are located within the transition zone. We formally relate this transition zone with respect to α and β, thus allowing us to control hardness and feasibility when randomly generating instances. Then, we study the optimization problem, the goal of which is to find the smallest tour that satisfies all time windows. We show that the empirical hardness is still related to the phase transition: hardness increases when moving from the infeasible region to the transition zone, as in the decision problem. However, unlike the decision problem, some hard instances are also located in the feasible region where instances are very loosely constrained.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.18334
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Phase Transition of the Euclidean Travelling Salesman Problem with Time Windows

Omar Rifki, Christine Solnon
1 citations
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
1.32
article

On the Phase Transition of the Euclidean Travelling Salesman Problem with Time Windows

Omar Rifki, Christine Solnon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Algorithms are often evaluated on randomly generated instances to study scale-up properties with respect to features such as the size, for example. Also, machine learning based approaches often train models on randomly generated instances as they need large sets of training instances. In this paper, we consider the Euclidean Travelling Salesman Problem with Time Windows (TSPTW), and we study the impact of parameters used to randomly generate TSPTW instances on hardness and feasibility. We first consider the decision version of the problem, where feasibility depends on start and end times of time windows. We introduce two parameters, α and β, for controlling the tightness of the time horizon and the time windows. We show that instance hardness is related to a phase transition phenomenon: as we increase α and β, we pass from an unfeasible region (where almost all generated instances have no solution) to a feasible region (where almost all generated instances have solutions), and the hardest instances are located within the transition zone. We formally relate this transition zone with respect to α and β, thus allowing us to control hardness and feasibility when randomly generating instances. Then, we study the optimization problem, the goal of which is to find the smallest tour that satisfies all time windows. We show that the empirical hardness is still related to the phase transition: hardness increases when moving from the infeasible region to the transition zone, as in the decision problem. However, unlike the decision problem, some hard instances are also located in the feasible region where instances are very loosely constrained.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence ResearchVol. 82
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.