Performance of Two Different Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Approaches for Improving Myoelectric Prosthetic Control

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical approach that can produce a neural-machine interface to provide additional electromyography (EMG) signals in intuitive control of myoelectric prostheses for high-level limb amputees. Clinically, TMR interface can be built by two types of surgical protocols. The first surgical protocol is to transfer a residual nerve to a denervated targeted muscle using a nerve-to-muscle suture and another is to anastomose a residual nerve to a targeted nerve via a nerve-to-nerve suture. Currently, it still remains unknown which surgical protocol would be more suitable for their clinical applications. In this study, a comparative investigation of the two TMR protocols was conducted by using animals and their performance in reconstructing EMG signals was evaluated. For nerve-to-muscle animal model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was implanted onto denervated biceps brachii muscle and for nerve-to-nerve model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was anastomosed to the distal end of musculocutaneous nerve. Post-surgery EMG signals were collected from all the TMR animals. Our results showed that the amplitudes of EMG signals gradually increased for the animals in the two TMR protocols over time, with an obvious difference between nerve-to-muscle and nerve-to-nerve animals. The signal-to-noise ratio and the centroid frequency of EMG signals in nerve-to-muscle animals were notably higher than those in nerve-to-muscle animals. These superior characteristics of the postoperative EMG signals demonstrated that nerve-to-nerve surgical protocol would be better than nerve-to-muscle in reconstructing EMG signals. The findings of this animal study suggest that both the TMR surgical protocols could be useful in providing additional EMG signals for myoelectric control, while the nerve-to-nerve suture would outperform the nerve-to-muscle suture in the quality and the appearance of the reconstructed extra EMG signals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2025.3558292
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Two Different Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Approaches for Improving Myoelectric Prosthetic Control

Chuanxin M. Niu, Jingjing Wei, Jianping Huang, Xiangxin Li et al.
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Performance of Two Different Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Approaches for Improving Myoelectric Prosthetic Control

Chuanxin M. Niu, Jingjing Wei, Jianping Huang, Xiangxin Li, Guanglin Li
article en

Abstract

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical approach that can produce a neural-machine interface to provide additional electromyography (EMG) signals in intuitive control of myoelectric prostheses for high-level limb amputees. Clinically, TMR interface can be built by two types of surgical protocols. The first surgical protocol is to transfer a residual nerve to a denervated targeted muscle using a nerve-to-muscle suture and another is to anastomose a residual nerve to a targeted nerve via a nerve-to-nerve suture. Currently, it still remains unknown which surgical protocol would be more suitable for their clinical applications. In this study, a comparative investigation of the two TMR protocols was conducted by using animals and their performance in reconstructing EMG signals was evaluated. For nerve-to-muscle animal model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was implanted onto denervated biceps brachii muscle and for nerve-to-nerve model, the proximal end of ulnar nerve was anastomosed to the distal end of musculocutaneous nerve. Post-surgery EMG signals were collected from all the TMR animals. Our results showed that the amplitudes of EMG signals gradually increased for the animals in the two TMR protocols over time, with an obvious difference between nerve-to-muscle and nerve-to-nerve animals. The signal-to-noise ratio and the centroid frequency of EMG signals in nerve-to-muscle animals were notably higher than those in nerve-to-muscle animals. These superior characteristics of the postoperative EMG signals demonstrated that nerve-to-nerve surgical protocol would be better than nerve-to-muscle in reconstructing EMG signals. The findings of this animal study suggest that both the TMR surgical protocols could be useful in providing additional EMG signals for myoelectric control, while the nerve-to-nerve suture would outperform the nerve-to-muscle suture in the quality and the appearance of the reconstructed extra EMG signals.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringVol. 33
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.