Disability inclusion in the House of Commons: A new institutionalism story

Abstract Reflecting the increasing salience of disability inclusion in Britain and ongoing efforts to improve accessibility of its political and social structures, this study focuses on the country’s key elected political institution, the House of Commons. Specifically, this paper addresses two research questions: (1) to what extent (and how) has the House’s efforts adapted to the needs of disabled Members, and (2) how does disability inclusion reflect on the institution’s capacity and willingness to change. Drawing upon analyses of documents and interviews with parliamentary staff and parliamentarians, it challenges the assumption of institutional rigidity of the House of Commons. In two out of three areas of analysis, it has changed significantly, as an institution and developed a strong institutional commitment, infrastructure, and comprehensive support services for disabled Members. However, a persistent pull towards continuity regarding parliamentary culture requires further ‘attitudinal’ change within and outside the House.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaf004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability inclusion in the House of Commons: A new institutionalism story

Ekaterina Kolpinskaya, Mike Winter
1 citations
Parliamentary Affairs
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

Disability inclusion in the House of Commons: A new institutionalism story

Ekaterina Kolpinskaya, Mike Winter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Reflecting the increasing salience of disability inclusion in Britain and ongoing efforts to improve accessibility of its political and social structures, this study focuses on the country’s key elected political institution, the House of Commons. Specifically, this paper addresses two research questions: (1) to what extent (and how) has the House’s efforts adapted to the needs of disabled Members, and (2) how does disability inclusion reflect on the institution’s capacity and willingness to change. Drawing upon analyses of documents and interviews with parliamentary staff and parliamentarians, it challenges the assumption of institutional rigidity of the House of Commons. In two out of three areas of analysis, it has changed significantly, as an institution and developed a strong institutional commitment, infrastructure, and comprehensive support services for disabled Members. However, a persistent pull towards continuity regarding parliamentary culture requires further ‘attitudinal’ change within and outside the House.

Parliamentary AffairsVol. 79(1)
University of Exeter (GB), Parliament of United Kingdom (GB)
University of Exeter
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disability inclusion in the House of Commons: A new institutionalism story — Ekaterina Kolpinskaya, Mike Winter · Parliamentary Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS