Cycling on the Freeway: The perilous state of open-source neuroscience software

Most scientists need software to perform their research (Barker et al., 2020;Carver et al., 2022;Hettrick, 2014;Hettrick et al., 2014;Switters & Osimo, 2019), and neuroscientists are no exception. Whether we work with reaction times, electrophysiological signals, or magnetic resonance imaging data, we rely on software to acquire, analyze, and statistically evaluate the raw data we obtain-or to generate such data if we work with simulations. In recent years, there has been a shift toward relying on free, open-source scientific software (FOSSS) for neuroscience data analysis (Poldrack et al., 2019), in line with the broader open science movement in academia (McKiernan et al., 2016) and wider industry trends (Eghbal, 2016). Importantly, FOSSS is typically developed by working scientists (not professional software developers), which sets up a precarious situation given the nature of the typical academic workplace wherein academics, especially in their early careers, are on short- and fixed-term contracts. In this paper, we argue that the existing ecosystem of neuroscientific open-source software is brittle, and discuss why and how the neuroscience community needs to come together to ensure a healthy software ecosystem to the benefit of all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00554
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cycling on the Freeway: The perilous state of open-source neuroscience software

Britta U. Westner, Alexandre Gramfort, Vladimir Litvak, Eric B. Larson et al.
3 citations
Imaging Neuroscience
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
4.90
article

Cycling on the Freeway: The perilous state of open-source neuroscience software

Britta U. Westner, Alexandre Gramfort, Vladimir Litvak, Eric B. Larson, Daniel McCloy, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen, Arfon M. Smith, Scott Makeig, Tim M. Tierney, Daniel S. Katz, Robert Oostenveld, Arnaud Delorme
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Most scientists need software to perform their research (Barker et al., 2020;Carver et al., 2022;Hettrick, 2014;Hettrick et al., 2014;Switters & Osimo, 2019), and neuroscientists are no exception. Whether we work with reaction times, electrophysiological signals, or magnetic resonance imaging data, we rely on software to acquire, analyze, and statistically evaluate the raw data we obtain-or to generate such data if we work with simulations. In recent years, there has been a shift toward relying on free, open-source scientific software (FOSSS) for neuroscience data analysis (Poldrack et al., 2019), in line with the broader open science movement in academia (McKiernan et al., 2016) and wider industry trends (Eghbal, 2016). Importantly, FOSSS is typically developed by working scientists (not professional software developers), which sets up a precarious situation given the nature of the typical academic workplace wherein academics, especially in their early careers, are on short- and fixed-term contracts. In this paper, we argue that the existing ecosystem of neuroscientific open-source software is brittle, and discuss why and how the neuroscience community needs to come together to ensure a healthy software ecosystem to the benefit of all.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 3
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Washington (US), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University of California San Diego (US), Centre Inria de Saclay (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), National Center for Supercomputing Applications (US), Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition (FR), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), University College London (GB), Voith (United States) (US)
Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Epilepsy Research UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
4.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.