From Canonical to Emancipatory Action Research: Using PrOH Modelling to Enhance Reflexivity

Action research is well recognised as an approach to transform, empower, and emancipate individuals and communities through collaborative enquiry and intervention. A central tenet of action research is to generate learning and new knowledge through the cyclical process of action and reflection. Yet, traditional action research methodologies pose limitations for thoroughly extracting learning from action due to lack of well-developed frameworks for understanding the researcher's role and their evolving identity throughout the research process. This limitation undermines the depth of engagement with the problem context and the potential for a researcher to reflect and generate learning in real-time. Based on multiple in-depth longitudinal case studies conducted over a decade, this paper argues for the emancipation of action researchers through a new <i>Situated Emancipatory Action Research</i> (SEAR) framework developed using a novel soft systems methodology called the Process Oriented Holonic (PrOH) Modelling Methodology. The SEAR framework seeks to overcome the limitations inherent in action research by emphasising the importance of a cognitive journey for the researcher, moving from a primarily detached observer to an immersed agent of change, while continuously <i>reflecting-in-action</i>. This study demonstrates how the SEAR framework enables emancipation of both the <i>researcher</i> and the <i>researched</i> through an intertwining and mutually complementary process of <i>deepening</i> and <i>widening</i> understanding through successive action research cycles. The new SEAR framework facilitates action researchers to become emancipated from their precepts, biases and identity, towards better engaging with problem situations and extraction of new knowledge. This paper recommends further investigation and experimentation using the SEAR framework to refine and improve its application in wider action research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systemic Practice and Action Research
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-025-09716-3
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Canonical to Emancipatory Action Research: Using PrOH Modelling to Enhance Reflexivity

Krishna C Balthu, Ben Clegg
Systemic Practice and Action Research
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

From Canonical to Emancipatory Action Research: Using PrOH Modelling to Enhance Reflexivity

Krishna C Balthu, Ben Clegg
article en

Abstract

Action research is well recognised as an approach to transform, empower, and emancipate individuals and communities through collaborative enquiry and intervention. A central tenet of action research is to generate learning and new knowledge through the cyclical process of action and reflection. Yet, traditional action research methodologies pose limitations for thoroughly extracting learning from action due to lack of well-developed frameworks for understanding the researcher's role and their evolving identity throughout the research process. This limitation undermines the depth of engagement with the problem context and the potential for a researcher to reflect and generate learning in real-time. Based on multiple in-depth longitudinal case studies conducted over a decade, this paper argues for the emancipation of action researchers through a new <i>Situated Emancipatory Action Research</i> (SEAR) framework developed using a novel soft systems methodology called the Process Oriented Holonic (PrOH) Modelling Methodology. The SEAR framework seeks to overcome the limitations inherent in action research by emphasising the importance of a cognitive journey for the researcher, moving from a primarily detached observer to an immersed agent of change, while continuously <i>reflecting-in-action</i>. This study demonstrates how the SEAR framework enables emancipation of both the <i>researcher</i> and the <i>researched</i> through an intertwining and mutually complementary process of <i>deepening</i> and <i>widening</i> understanding through successive action research cycles. The new SEAR framework facilitates action researchers to become emancipated from their precepts, biases and identity, towards better engaging with problem situations and extraction of new knowledge. This paper recommends further investigation and experimentation using the SEAR framework to refine and improve its application in wider action research settings.

Systemic Practice and Action ResearchVol. 38(2)
Aston University (GB)
Innovate UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Canonical to Emancipatory Action Research: Using PrOH Modelling to Enhance Reflexivity — Krishna C Balthu, Ben Clegg · Systemic Practice and Action Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS