In-depth analysis of CT resolution impact on porosity evaluation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Accurate porosity determination of Additive Manufacturing (AM) parts remains a key challenge. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how computed tomography (CT) resolution affects porosity detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) manufactured parts by comparing X-ray based measurements from laboratory and synchrotron sources. To represent a range of porosity levels, three samples were selected from an extensive set of LPBF experiments, of respectively low, medium, and high porosities. A laboratory source based computed tomography system was used for the acquisition at the best resolution considering the size limitation due to the sample geometry. In order to achieve higher resolution, a synchrotron source was additionally utilized. The comparative analysis revealed that the porosity measurements from both the laboratory and synchrotron sources were in good agreement for samples with low and high porosity levels. This indicates that for extreme ends of the studied porosity spectrum, laboratory CT systems can provide reliable measurements. However, for the sample with medium porosity, the limited resolution of the laboratory CT leads to an overestimation compared to the synchrotron CT results. This discrepancy is found to be due to inaccuracies in detecting and clustering neighboring pores, leading to an overestimation of porosity. A comparison of the obtained results with the porosity determinations by the widely used Archimedes method is proposed to show the potential and the limitations of each technique for the assessment of additively manufactured parts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tomography of Materials and Structures
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-depth analysis of CT resolution impact on porosity evaluation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Jitendra Singh Rathore, Andrew King, J.P. Garandet, Florian Le Bourdais
1 citations
Tomography of Materials and Structures
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

In-depth analysis of CT resolution impact on porosity evaluation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Jitendra Singh Rathore, Andrew King, J.P. Garandet, Florian Le Bourdais
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate porosity determination of Additive Manufacturing (AM) parts remains a key challenge. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how computed tomography (CT) resolution affects porosity detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) manufactured parts by comparing X-ray based measurements from laboratory and synchrotron sources. To represent a range of porosity levels, three samples were selected from an extensive set of LPBF experiments, of respectively low, medium, and high porosities. A laboratory source based computed tomography system was used for the acquisition at the best resolution considering the size limitation due to the sample geometry. In order to achieve higher resolution, a synchrotron source was additionally utilized. The comparative analysis revealed that the porosity measurements from both the laboratory and synchrotron sources were in good agreement for samples with low and high porosity levels. This indicates that for extreme ends of the studied porosity spectrum, laboratory CT systems can provide reliable measurements. However, for the sample with medium porosity, the limited resolution of the laboratory CT leads to an overestimation compared to the synchrotron CT results. This discrepancy is found to be due to inaccuracies in detecting and clustering neighboring pores, leading to an overestimation of porosity. A comparison of the obtained results with the porosity determinations by the widely used Archimedes method is proposed to show the potential and the limitations of each technique for the assessment of additively manufactured parts.

Tomography of Materials and StructuresVol. 8
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Synchrotron soleil (FR), Laboratoire d’Innovation pour les Technologies des Énergies Nouvelles et les nanomatériaux (FR), Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.