Wanderer between the worlds: Telegram use from the users’ perspective

Abstract The messenger Telegram has gained importance for the mediated constitution of counterpublics in German-speaking countries since 2020. However, most research on Telegram focuses on the content shared and the networks that have developed on the platform. Meanwhile, knowledge about the users of counterpublic Telegram channels and groups and their processes of appropriating the messenger is very limited. Based on 14 in-depth interviews with users, this article explores how individuals connect with like-minded people on Telegram, how they process the information they receive there and why they are attracted to the medium in general. We group them in our analysis according to the meaning they ascribe to the Telegram community, their media repertoires, and how they negotiate contradictions between counterpublic and mainstream information, developing a typology of four types: (1) topic-oriented users, (2) confident researchers, (3) libertarian activists and (4) alienated users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publizistik
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-025-00874-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wanderer between the worlds: Telegram use from the users’ perspective

Lars Rinsdorf, Katarina Bader, Kathrin Friederike Müller
2 citations
Publizistik
Social Media and Politics
7.73
article

Wanderer between the worlds: Telegram use from the users’ perspective

Lars Rinsdorf, Katarina Bader, Kathrin Friederike Müller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The messenger Telegram has gained importance for the mediated constitution of counterpublics in German-speaking countries since 2020. However, most research on Telegram focuses on the content shared and the networks that have developed on the platform. Meanwhile, knowledge about the users of counterpublic Telegram channels and groups and their processes of appropriating the messenger is very limited. Based on 14 in-depth interviews with users, this article explores how individuals connect with like-minded people on Telegram, how they process the information they receive there and why they are attracted to the medium in general. We group them in our analysis according to the meaning they ascribe to the Telegram community, their media repertoires, and how they negotiate contradictions between counterpublic and mainstream information, developing a typology of four types: (1) topic-oriented users, (2) confident researchers, (3) libertarian activists and (4) alienated users.

PublizistikVol. 70(1-2)
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE), Stuttgart Media University (DE), University of Münster (DE), Institut für Medien- und Kommunikationspolitik (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Media and Politics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wanderer between the worlds: Telegram use from the users’ perspective — Lars Rinsdorf, Katarina Bader, et al. · Publizistik (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS