Lessons from a participatory forest restoration program on socio-ecological and environmental aspects in Nepal

• We assessed donor-driven participatory forest restoration in Nepal's degraded Churia hills. • Synergistic outcomes emerged by integrating community choices, government support, and flexible donor aid. • Effective policy alignment enhanced ecosystem services, social capital, and ecological functions. • Sustainable financing was lacking, requiring integration into government and community plans. • Tripartite model is practical and participatory for socio-environmental sustainability, encouraging customized adoption. Forest and landscape restoration (FLR) is a key strategy for reviving degraded ecosystems, yet field-level evidence remains limited. Despite being part of over 30 international environmental agreements, Nepal's forest degradation rate exceeded 1.5 % annually. To combat this, donor-supported restoration efforts are ongoing, among others. This study evaluated a donor-backed, community-led restoration initiative within Nepal's Terai Arc Landscape in the Churia Hills of Phulbari, Dang District. Using remote sensing and GIS, we analyzed land cover changes from 1990 to 2020 across 25 community forests (5034 ha) managed by 5061 households. Ground-level biophysical variables were compared between non-intervention areas (NIA), fenced, and planted (FAP) areas, and fenced, planted, and pothole (FPP) areas employing a random sampling technique ( n = 30). Local communities ( n = 40) were consulted, and field observations ( n > 6) were conducted over multiple seasons and years. Results showed an 8.6 % increase in forest cover over three decades, with a 26.1 % rise in restoration experiment sites (FAP and FPP) from 2015 to 2020. FPP sites, with soil-water retention strategies, significantly ( p < 0.05) outperformed NIA and FAP sites, proving effective in reclaiming denuded slopes and conserving water in the face of climate change. While donor-funded projects initiated these activities, their long-term sustainability is uncertain. Locals fear that restoration gains may be lost once funding ends. Restoration efforts must be integrated into government annual budgets and plans to ensure lasting success, with community involvement to promote shared responsibility and ownership. We propose a tripartite FLR model, assigning roles to governments, communities, and other stakeholders for Nepal and similar regions. Our findings provide valuable insights for sustainable planning, especially for restoring degraded landscapes such as dry, denuded slopes, areas affected by anthropogenic disturbances, or combinations, pathways toward achieving sustainable development goals and beyond.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Trees Forests and People
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100854
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons from a participatory forest restoration program on socio-ecological and environmental aspects in Nepal

Hari Prasad Pandey, Armando Apan, Tek Maraseni, Shila Pokhrel et al.
4 citations
Trees Forests and People
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
4.42
article

Lessons from a participatory forest restoration program on socio-ecological and environmental aspects in Nepal

Hari Prasad Pandey, Armando Apan, Tek Maraseni, Shila Pokhrel, Han Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• We assessed donor-driven participatory forest restoration in Nepal's degraded Churia hills. • Synergistic outcomes emerged by integrating community choices, government support, and flexible donor aid. • Effective policy alignment enhanced ecosystem services, social capital, and ecological functions. • Sustainable financing was lacking, requiring integration into government and community plans. • Tripartite model is practical and participatory for socio-environmental sustainability, encouraging customized adoption. Forest and landscape restoration (FLR) is a key strategy for reviving degraded ecosystems, yet field-level evidence remains limited. Despite being part of over 30 international environmental agreements, Nepal's forest degradation rate exceeded 1.5 % annually. To combat this, donor-supported restoration efforts are ongoing, among others. This study evaluated a donor-backed, community-led restoration initiative within Nepal's Terai Arc Landscape in the Churia Hills of Phulbari, Dang District. Using remote sensing and GIS, we analyzed land cover changes from 1990 to 2020 across 25 community forests (5034 ha) managed by 5061 households. Ground-level biophysical variables were compared between non-intervention areas (NIA), fenced, and planted (FAP) areas, and fenced, planted, and pothole (FPP) areas employing a random sampling technique ( n = 30). Local communities ( n = 40) were consulted, and field observations ( n > 6) were conducted over multiple seasons and years. Results showed an 8.6 % increase in forest cover over three decades, with a 26.1 % rise in restoration experiment sites (FAP and FPP) from 2015 to 2020. FPP sites, with soil-water retention strategies, significantly ( p < 0.05) outperformed NIA and FAP sites, proving effective in reclaiming denuded slopes and conserving water in the face of climate change. While donor-funded projects initiated these activities, their long-term sustainability is uncertain. Locals fear that restoration gains may be lost once funding ends. Restoration efforts must be integrated into government annual budgets and plans to ensure lasting success, with community involvement to promote shared responsibility and ownership. We propose a tripartite FLR model, assigning roles to governments, communities, and other stakeholders for Nepal and similar regions. Our findings provide valuable insights for sustainable planning, especially for restoring degraded landscapes such as dry, denuded slopes, areas affected by anthropogenic disturbances, or combinations, pathways toward achieving sustainable development goals and beyond.

Trees Forests and PeopleVol. 20
University of Southern Queensland
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.