It is Crucial to Ground Gambling Harm as an Impact to Health-Related Quality of Life

Abstract Purpose of Review This review examines the evolution of gambling-related harm (GRH) measurement over the past two decades, highlighting the shift from repurposed problem gambling severity measures to dedicated GRH instruments. It aims to clarify the importance of grounding GRH as an impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and address challenges in quantifying GRH impacts. Recent Findings The latest generation of GRH measures, such as the Gambling Harm Scales (GHS) family, demonstrate strong psychometric properties but require benchmarking to HRQoL. Validation studies using diverse methodologies, including indirect elicitation, qualitative interviews, and expert evaluation, provide compelling evidence for the validity of these instruments in capturing meaningful differences in harm severity across the spectrum. However, challenges remain in quantifying the precise impact of GRH, particularly at lower levels of severity. Direct elicitation methods may overestimate harm due to stigma and response framing effects, while indirect methods using conventional health measures such as the SF-6D or EQ-5D may be overly conservative in their absolute estimates. Summary A hybrid approach, anchoring the upper severity limit using direct methods and estimating the gradient of harm using indirect methods with diverse criterion measures, offers a promising solution to quantifying GRH. Importantly, concerns over the validity of specific GHS items are largely moot, as GRH is a unidimensional construct well-indicated by a broad range of symptomatology. The key challenge lies in grounding GRH scores to HRQoL decrements, which will enable comparisons with other health conditions and resolve questions like the prevention paradox. Further empirical work and collaboration among researchers are needed to reach consensus on this fundamental issue, working towards validated and grounded measures that are necessary to inform evidence-based policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-025-00647-6
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It is Crucial to Ground Gambling Harm as an Impact to Health-Related Quality of Life

Matthew Rockloff, Catherine Tulloch, Matthew Browne
1 links
Current Addiction Reports
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
article

It is Crucial to Ground Gambling Harm as an Impact to Health-Related Quality of Life

Matthew Rockloff, Catherine Tulloch, Matthew Browne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This review examines the evolution of gambling-related harm (GRH) measurement over the past two decades, highlighting the shift from repurposed problem gambling severity measures to dedicated GRH instruments. It aims to clarify the importance of grounding GRH as an impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and address challenges in quantifying GRH impacts. Recent Findings The latest generation of GRH measures, such as the Gambling Harm Scales (GHS) family, demonstrate strong psychometric properties but require benchmarking to HRQoL. Validation studies using diverse methodologies, including indirect elicitation, qualitative interviews, and expert evaluation, provide compelling evidence for the validity of these instruments in capturing meaningful differences in harm severity across the spectrum. However, challenges remain in quantifying the precise impact of GRH, particularly at lower levels of severity. Direct elicitation methods may overestimate harm due to stigma and response framing effects, while indirect methods using conventional health measures such as the SF-6D or EQ-5D may be overly conservative in their absolute estimates. Summary A hybrid approach, anchoring the upper severity limit using direct methods and estimating the gradient of harm using indirect methods with diverse criterion measures, offers a promising solution to quantifying GRH. Importantly, concerns over the validity of specific GHS items are largely moot, as GRH is a unidimensional construct well-indicated by a broad range of symptomatology. The key challenge lies in grounding GRH scores to HRQoL decrements, which will enable comparisons with other health conditions and resolve questions like the prevention paradox. Further empirical work and collaboration among researchers are needed to reach consensus on this fundamental issue, working towards validated and grounded measures that are necessary to inform evidence-based policy.

Current Addiction ReportsVol. 12(1)
Central Queensland University (AU)
Central Queensland University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.