Resistance mechanism of energy canes developed from Saccharum spontaenum and Erianthus arundinaceus against sugarcane borer pests

• Saccharum spontaneum and Erianthus arundinaceus introgressed canes are Type I & II. • The incidence of sugarcane borers was significantly lower in Type II energy canes. • Type II energy cane-fed sugarcane borers reduced larval and pupal survivability. • Silicon and trypsin inhibitors negatively correlated with sugarcane borer biology. • SBIEC14006, 11004, 11001 (Type II) and SBIEC 13010 (Type I) showed borer tolerance. A total of 26 newly developed energy canes including Type I having Saccharum spontaneum as immediate parent and Type II having as immediate parent Erianthus arundinaceus were screened for resistance against sugarcane early shoot borer (ESB), Chilo infuscatellus and internode borer (INB), Chilo sacchariphagus indicus. Field and lab screening study results indicated that ESB and INB incidence was much lower in E. arundinaceus energy canes, with no discernible impairment to internode morphology than in S. spontaneum energy canes. Furthermore, Type II energy canes-fed ESB and INB showed adverse effects on growth and development by reducing their larval and pupal survivability. Besides, ESB and INB larval durations were 22 to 34 days and 39 to 52 days in Type I and Type II energy canes, respectively. A significant increase in secondary metabolites, such as phenols, silicon content, polyphenol oxidase and proteinase inhibitors, as well as a decrease in positive nutritive compounds in E. arundinaceus, indicated the antibiosis mechanism of resistance. Furthermore, E. arundinaceus PIs effectively inhibited the midgut proteases of ESB and INB compared to S. spontaneum PIs. Proteinase inhibitors, silicon and phenolic content showed a significant negative correlation with the incidence and development of sugarcane borers. The study identified three borer-tolerant Type II energy canes (SBIEC 14006, SBIEC 11004, SBIEC 11001) and one Type I cane (SBIEC 13010), which could be utilized for biofuel production. In addition, these elite clones can serve as genetic stocks for developing borer-tolerant varieties in future energy cane breeding programmes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2025.102408
Primary Topic
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance mechanism of energy canes developed from Saccharum spontaenum and Erianthus arundinaceus against sugarcane borer pests

M. Punithavalli, M. Balaji Rajkumar, Govindaraj Perumal
Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
article

Resistance mechanism of energy canes developed from Saccharum spontaenum and Erianthus arundinaceus against sugarcane borer pests

M. Punithavalli, M. Balaji Rajkumar, Govindaraj Perumal
article en

Abstract

• Saccharum spontaneum and Erianthus arundinaceus introgressed canes are Type I & II. • The incidence of sugarcane borers was significantly lower in Type II energy canes. • Type II energy cane-fed sugarcane borers reduced larval and pupal survivability. • Silicon and trypsin inhibitors negatively correlated with sugarcane borer biology. • SBIEC14006, 11004, 11001 (Type II) and SBIEC 13010 (Type I) showed borer tolerance. A total of 26 newly developed energy canes including Type I having Saccharum spontaneum as immediate parent and Type II having as immediate parent Erianthus arundinaceus were screened for resistance against sugarcane early shoot borer (ESB), Chilo infuscatellus and internode borer (INB), Chilo sacchariphagus indicus. Field and lab screening study results indicated that ESB and INB incidence was much lower in E. arundinaceus energy canes, with no discernible impairment to internode morphology than in S. spontaneum energy canes. Furthermore, Type II energy canes-fed ESB and INB showed adverse effects on growth and development by reducing their larval and pupal survivability. Besides, ESB and INB larval durations were 22 to 34 days and 39 to 52 days in Type I and Type II energy canes, respectively. A significant increase in secondary metabolites, such as phenols, silicon content, polyphenol oxidase and proteinase inhibitors, as well as a decrease in positive nutritive compounds in E. arundinaceus, indicated the antibiosis mechanism of resistance. Furthermore, E. arundinaceus PIs effectively inhibited the midgut proteases of ESB and INB compared to S. spontaneum PIs. Proteinase inhibitors, silicon and phenolic content showed a significant negative correlation with the incidence and development of sugarcane borers. The study identified three borer-tolerant Type II energy canes (SBIEC 14006, SBIEC 11004, SBIEC 11001) and one Type I cane (SBIEC 13010), which could be utilized for biofuel production. In addition, these elite clones can serve as genetic stocks for developing borer-tolerant varieties in future energy cane breeding programmes.

Journal of Asia-Pacific EntomologyVol. 28(2)
Indian Institute of Spices Research (IN), Sugarcane Breeding Institute (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.