The Era of Ivan the Terrible: a Leap Forward or the Cultivation of Turmoil? A Look From the 21th Century

The author of the article turns to the long-standing acute part of Russian historiographical and historiosophical discourse related to the study of the personality and reforms of Ivan the Terrible in the context of harsh realities of the 16th century. It is suggested that his time can be understood only by connecting it with the previous and subsequent development of Russia. The tsar's actions were aimed to respond to the brutal external and internal political challenges of the time. An excessively repressive character of this response was due to complex psychological structure of the sovereign's personality formed by an environment that left its unhealthy imprint on him. However, to reduce the entire policy of Grozny to a psychiatric diagnosis means to deliberately get away from the essence of a large and inexhaustible problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Istoriya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840025951-5
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Era of Ivan the Terrible: a Leap Forward or the Cultivation of Turmoil? A Look From the 21th Century

Vladimir V. Degoev
Istoriya
Byzantine Studies and History
article

The Era of Ivan the Terrible: a Leap Forward or the Cultivation of Turmoil? A Look From the 21th Century

Vladimir V. Degoev
article en

Abstract

The author of the article turns to the long-standing acute part of Russian historiographical and historiosophical discourse related to the study of the personality and reforms of Ivan the Terrible in the context of harsh realities of the 16th century. It is suggested that his time can be understood only by connecting it with the previous and subsequent development of Russia. The tsar's actions were aimed to respond to the brutal external and internal political challenges of the time. An excessively repressive character of this response was due to complex psychological structure of the sovereign's personality formed by an environment that left its unhealthy imprint on him. However, to reduce the entire policy of Grozny to a psychiatric diagnosis means to deliberately get away from the essence of a large and inexhaustible problem.

IstoriyaVol. 16(1 (147))
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Era of Ivan the Terrible: a Leap Forward or the Cultivation of Turmoil? A Look From the 21th Century — Vladimir V. Degoev · Istoriya (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS