The Foundation Myth as a Category of Historical Politics

The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the concept of the “foundation myth” in the context of historical politics. A number of overlapping concepts are analyzed that describe historical narratives that act as symbolic boundaries of ethnic and national identities. It is shown that the basic meaning of the concept of “foundation myth” had a narrower meaning, describing myths about the moment of the emergence of groups and political systems. Later, the context of the concept was expanded by Russian authors, who included in it the idea of the role of wars and revolutions in the formation of collective identity. An alternative research approach focuses on ethnogenetic myths about great ancestors. Within the framework of ethnosymbolism, the idea of “myths of origin” is developing, linking the past and present of modern nations through genealogical and ideological types of values. The broadest concept is the “constitutive myth”, which covers the totality of myths of the foundation of a separate national state. Within the framework of historical policy, it is important to identify the substantiating and counter-representative type of myths that describe different strategies for connecting the past and the present in historical narratives. As the analysis of examples shows, military narratives define most of the plots, which allows us to conclude that they play a central role in encoding cultural representations of identity. Most of the analyzed concepts describe the conflict of founding myths within states as a choice of the trajectory of national identity and ways of further development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Istoriya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840034048-1
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Foundation Myth as a Category of Historical Politics

A. Yu. Bubnov
Istoriya
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

The Foundation Myth as a Category of Historical Politics

A. Yu. Bubnov
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the concept of the “foundation myth” in the context of historical politics. A number of overlapping concepts are analyzed that describe historical narratives that act as symbolic boundaries of ethnic and national identities. It is shown that the basic meaning of the concept of “foundation myth” had a narrower meaning, describing myths about the moment of the emergence of groups and political systems. Later, the context of the concept was expanded by Russian authors, who included in it the idea of the role of wars and revolutions in the formation of collective identity. An alternative research approach focuses on ethnogenetic myths about great ancestors. Within the framework of ethnosymbolism, the idea of “myths of origin” is developing, linking the past and present of modern nations through genealogical and ideological types of values. The broadest concept is the “constitutive myth”, which covers the totality of myths of the foundation of a separate national state. Within the framework of historical policy, it is important to identify the substantiating and counter-representative type of myths that describe different strategies for connecting the past and the present in historical narratives. As the analysis of examples shows, military narratives define most of the plots, which allows us to conclude that they play a central role in encoding cultural representations of identity. Most of the analyzed concepts describe the conflict of founding myths within states as a choice of the trajectory of national identity and ways of further development.

IstoriyaVol. 16(1 (147))
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.