Riddles of Crimean Kiziltas: on the issue of the “Case of Abbot Parthenius” of 1866—1867

The article analyzes the military court case on the murder (disappearance) of the abbot of the Kiziltash Monastery of St. Stephen of Sourozh, hegumen Parthenius, in which three Crimean Tatars living in the village of Taraktash in Feodosia County were convicted and executed. It is shown that this incident is still the subject of speculation and controversy. Modern Crimean Tatar researchers believe that the suspects were convicted without guilt, and the trial was staged. There is even a version that hegumen Parthenius did not die at all, but secretly absconded to avoid the church trial that threatened him. The article attempts to examine the life of hegumen Parthenius and to understand how objectively the investigation and trial of his disappearance were conducted. It is emphasized that a careful study of the materials of the military court case forces us to admit that there are no serious grounds to assert that the Feodosia military field court acted in a biased manner and made a deliberately incorrect decision, and attempts to present this story as a striking example of persecution of the Crimean Tatar people seem untenable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Istoriya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840032081-8
Primary Topic
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Riddles of Crimean Kiziltas: on the issue of the “Case of Abbot Parthenius” of 1866—1867

Liubov Melnikova
Istoriya
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
article

Riddles of Crimean Kiziltas: on the issue of the “Case of Abbot Parthenius” of 1866—1867

Liubov Melnikova
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the military court case on the murder (disappearance) of the abbot of the Kiziltash Monastery of St. Stephen of Sourozh, hegumen Parthenius, in which three Crimean Tatars living in the village of Taraktash in Feodosia County were convicted and executed. It is shown that this incident is still the subject of speculation and controversy. Modern Crimean Tatar researchers believe that the suspects were convicted without guilt, and the trial was staged. There is even a version that hegumen Parthenius did not die at all, but secretly absconded to avoid the church trial that threatened him. The article attempts to examine the life of hegumen Parthenius and to understand how objectively the investigation and trial of his disappearance were conducted. It is emphasized that a careful study of the materials of the military court case forces us to admit that there are no serious grounds to assert that the Feodosia military field court acted in a biased manner and made a deliberately incorrect decision, and attempts to present this story as a striking example of persecution of the Crimean Tatar people seem untenable.

IstoriyaVol. 16(1 (147))
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.