Democratic Resilience and Vulnerability in South Korea: Lessons from South Korea's 2024 – 2025 Constitutional Crisis

This article examines South Korea's 2024–2025 constitutional crisis, triggered by President Yoon Suk-yeol's unconstitutional declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024. The analysis focuses on three key aspects: the role of election fraud conspiracy theories in motivating anti-democratic actions, the dynamics of democratic resistance, and the challenges of maintaining cross-partisan pro-democracy coalitions. The crisis revealed both democratic vulnerabilities and resilience in South Korea's political system. While initial responses successfully prevented democratic backsliding through rapid mobilization and cross-partisan cooperation, subsequent polarization around election fraud claims complicated democratic recovery. The case offers crucial insights about democratic resilience, particularly highlighting the importance of immediate response to backsliding attempts and the challenge of maintaining broad pro-democracy coalitions against emerging partisan divisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Affairs
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5509/2025982-art2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Resilience and Vulnerability in South Korea: Lessons from South Korea's 2024 – 2025 Constitutional Crisis

Jong Hee Park
3 citations
Pacific Affairs
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
article

Democratic Resilience and Vulnerability in South Korea: Lessons from South Korea's 2024 – 2025 Constitutional Crisis

Jong Hee Park
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines South Korea's 2024–2025 constitutional crisis, triggered by President Yoon Suk-yeol's unconstitutional declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024. The analysis focuses on three key aspects: the role of election fraud conspiracy theories in motivating anti-democratic actions, the dynamics of democratic resistance, and the challenges of maintaining cross-partisan pro-democracy coalitions. The crisis revealed both democratic vulnerabilities and resilience in South Korea's political system. While initial responses successfully prevented democratic backsliding through rapid mobilization and cross-partisan cooperation, subsequent polarization around election fraud claims complicated democratic recovery. The case offers crucial insights about democratic resilience, particularly highlighting the importance of immediate response to backsliding attempts and the challenge of maintaining broad pro-democracy coalitions against emerging partisan divisions.

Pacific AffairsVol. 98(2)
Seoul National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.