Aorta Wall Stress during Exercise in Patients with an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Insights from a Case Series

Individuals with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) are recommended to avoid intense exercise for fear of marked increases in aortic wall stress (AWS). However, no study has measured AWS during exercise. The aim of this case series was to examine AWS during "light-to-moderate" aerobic exercise in individuals with ATAA and healthy control (CON) participants.Three clinically stable patients with ATAA (2 male, mean age: 74 ± 1 years) and 3 CON (2 male, mean age: 69 ± 7 years) were studied on 2 separate days. Day 1: a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed to measure peak aerobic power (VO<sub>2</sub>peak), maximal heart rate, and blood pressure (BP). Day 2: cardiac and aortic magnetic resonance imaging were performed at rest and during submaximal (3-5 metabolic equivalents) "stepper" exercise during which cardiac output (Qc), aorta diameters, wall thickness, and BP were measured. Circumferential ascending and descending AWS were calculated in accord with LaPlace Law, whereas aorta mechanical efficiency was derived as the AWS/Qc slope.Patients with ATAA demonstrated lower median VO<sub>2</sub>peak (18.2 vs. 24.1 mL/kg/min). During exercise, the absolute ascending (ATAA: 257 vs. CON: 269 kPa) and descending AWS increased (ATAA: 224 vs. CON: 207 kPa), and ∆AWS during exercise was similar between ATAA and CON (Ascending, ATAA: 79 vs. CON: 62 kPa; Descending, ATAA: 64 vs. CON: 55 kPa). During exercise, ascending and descending AWS were 76 to 83% below ATAA rupture thresholds (i.e., 800-1,200 kPa) in all patients. Finally, exercise Qc was 17% lower and the ascending AWS/Qc slope was 30% higher in ATAA (16 kPa/L/min) versus CON (12 kPa/L/min).Our findings demonstrate "light-to-moderate" aerobic exercise produces similar AWS responses between ATAA and CON and is well below aneurysmal rupture thresholds. The higher AWS/Qc slope in ATAA suggests decreased aortic mechanical efficiency and may be a useful measure for exercise prescription for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aorta
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2558-4266
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aorta Wall Stress during Exercise in Patients with an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Insights from a Case Series

Justin Grenier, Stephen Foulkes, Richard B. Thompson, Rachel J. Skow et al.
2 citations
Aorta
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
0.84
article

Aorta Wall Stress during Exercise in Patients with an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Insights from a Case Series

Justin Grenier, Stephen Foulkes, Richard B. Thompson, Rachel J. Skow, Mark J. Haykowsky, John Alex Elefteriades, M. Sean McMurtry
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Individuals with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) are recommended to avoid intense exercise for fear of marked increases in aortic wall stress (AWS). However, no study has measured AWS during exercise. The aim of this case series was to examine AWS during "light-to-moderate" aerobic exercise in individuals with ATAA and healthy control (CON) participants.Three clinically stable patients with ATAA (2 male, mean age: 74 ± 1 years) and 3 CON (2 male, mean age: 69 ± 7 years) were studied on 2 separate days. Day 1: a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed to measure peak aerobic power (VO<sub>2</sub>peak), maximal heart rate, and blood pressure (BP). Day 2: cardiac and aortic magnetic resonance imaging were performed at rest and during submaximal (3-5 metabolic equivalents) "stepper" exercise during which cardiac output (Qc), aorta diameters, wall thickness, and BP were measured. Circumferential ascending and descending AWS were calculated in accord with LaPlace Law, whereas aorta mechanical efficiency was derived as the AWS/Qc slope.Patients with ATAA demonstrated lower median VO<sub>2</sub>peak (18.2 vs. 24.1 mL/kg/min). During exercise, the absolute ascending (ATAA: 257 vs. CON: 269 kPa) and descending AWS increased (ATAA: 224 vs. CON: 207 kPa), and ∆AWS during exercise was similar between ATAA and CON (Ascending, ATAA: 79 vs. CON: 62 kPa; Descending, ATAA: 64 vs. CON: 55 kPa). During exercise, ascending and descending AWS were 76 to 83% below ATAA rupture thresholds (i.e., 800-1,200 kPa) in all patients. Finally, exercise Qc was 17% lower and the ascending AWS/Qc slope was 30% higher in ATAA (16 kPa/L/min) versus CON (12 kPa/L/min).Our findings demonstrate "light-to-moderate" aerobic exercise produces similar AWS responses between ATAA and CON and is well below aneurysmal rupture thresholds. The higher AWS/Qc slope in ATAA suggests decreased aortic mechanical efficiency and may be a useful measure for exercise prescription for these patients.

AortaVol. 12(05)
University of Alberta (CA), Yale University (US), St Vincents Institute of Medical Research (AU)
University of Alberta
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.