Interobserver variability in lymph node evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography in cholangiocarcinoma

Endosonographic assessment of LN morphology and characterization demonstrates considerable variability among endosonographers. Thus, there is a clear need for standardization in preoperative LN evaluation, including establishing consensus about when to perform tissue acquisition, based on objective criteria such as short-axis diameter. Further research is required to refine and optimize these guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2577-5449
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interobserver variability in lymph node evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography in cholangiocarcinoma

Marco Brayda‐Bruno, Willem J. Lammers, David M. de Jong, Lydi Van Driel et al.
3 citations
Endoscopy International Open
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
6.02
article

Interobserver variability in lymph node evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography in cholangiocarcinoma

Marco Brayda‐Bruno, Willem J. Lammers, David M. de Jong, Lydi Van Driel, Daniëlle Roosterman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Endosonographic assessment of LN morphology and characterization demonstrates considerable variability among endosonographers. Thus, there is a clear need for standardization in preoperative LN evaluation, including establishing consensus about when to perform tissue acquisition, based on objective criteria such as short-axis diameter. Further research is required to refine and optimize these guidelines.

Endoscopy International OpenVol. 13(CP)
Erasmus MC (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.