Two decades of no-take zones enhance lobster (Jasus edwardsii) abundance and size within marine protected areas in southeastern Australia

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a proven strategy for managing various stressors affecting marine ecosystems. No-take MPAs safeguard targeted species from fishing pressures, often enhancing their density, size, and biomass. Benthic species with high site fidelity, such as lobsters, have shown to benefit from such protections worldwide. This study examined the effects of MPAs on lobsters ( Jasus edwardsii ) within a southeastern Australian MPA network. From 2013 to 2023, we conducted fishery-independent sampling using 1065 baited pots (555 inside MPAs, 510 outside), sampling over 2000 lobsters. More and larger lobsters were caught per pot inside the MPAs (3.05 individuals/pot, 127 mm average length/pot) compared to outside (1.4 individuals/pot, 121 mm average length/pot). To assess MPA effects while accounting for habitat and environmental variability, we applied species distribution models by associating several response variables with seafloor structure (e.g., depth, seafloor complexity), oceanographic (e.g., temperature, wave energy), and protection/context (e.g., status, fishing region, MPA zone) factors. These models explained between 18 % and 75 % of the variability in the response variables with predictive accuracy ranging from 45 % to 86 %. Jasus edwardsii counts, sizes, and biomass – both overall and by sex – responded positively to MPA protection despite regional and environmental variability. Other than protection status, depth, fishing region, and MPA zone were consistently important across most models with the remaining variables showing varying influence. These findings highlight MPAs' dual role in conserving biodiversity and potentially supplementing local fisheries, with benefits that likely extend beyond their boundaries. • No-take MPAs increased lobster size and abundance off Victoria, Australia. • Higher lobster abundances were observed in the west with larger sizes in the east. • Lobster size and abundance increased with protection despite habitat variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111154
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two decades of no-take zones enhance lobster (Jasus edwardsii) abundance and size within marine protected areas in southeastern Australia

Mary Young, Michael A. Sams, Harry Simmons, Daniel Ierodiaconou et al.
Biological Conservation
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
article

Two decades of no-take zones enhance lobster (Jasus edwardsii) abundance and size within marine protected areas in southeastern Australia

Mary Young, Michael A. Sams, Harry Simmons, Daniel Ierodiaconou, Todd A. Doran, Oli Dalby
article en

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a proven strategy for managing various stressors affecting marine ecosystems. No-take MPAs safeguard targeted species from fishing pressures, often enhancing their density, size, and biomass. Benthic species with high site fidelity, such as lobsters, have shown to benefit from such protections worldwide. This study examined the effects of MPAs on lobsters ( Jasus edwardsii ) within a southeastern Australian MPA network. From 2013 to 2023, we conducted fishery-independent sampling using 1065 baited pots (555 inside MPAs, 510 outside), sampling over 2000 lobsters. More and larger lobsters were caught per pot inside the MPAs (3.05 individuals/pot, 127 mm average length/pot) compared to outside (1.4 individuals/pot, 121 mm average length/pot). To assess MPA effects while accounting for habitat and environmental variability, we applied species distribution models by associating several response variables with seafloor structure (e.g., depth, seafloor complexity), oceanographic (e.g., temperature, wave energy), and protection/context (e.g., status, fishing region, MPA zone) factors. These models explained between 18 % and 75 % of the variability in the response variables with predictive accuracy ranging from 45 % to 86 %. Jasus edwardsii counts, sizes, and biomass – both overall and by sex – responded positively to MPA protection despite regional and environmental variability. Other than protection status, depth, fishing region, and MPA zone were consistently important across most models with the remaining variables showing varying influence. These findings highlight MPAs' dual role in conserving biodiversity and potentially supplementing local fisheries, with benefits that likely extend beyond their boundaries. • No-take MPAs increased lobster size and abundance off Victoria, Australia. • Higher lobster abundances were observed in the west with larger sizes in the east. • Lobster size and abundance increased with protection despite habitat variability.

Biological ConservationVol. 306
Deakin University (AU), Parks Victoria (AU)
Parks Victoria, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.