“Waiter, the checkmark please”: Restaurant managers' and customers' evaluations of nudges towards sustainable food choices

Food choices play a key role in sustainability. Restaurants, given their significant impact on food-related carbon emissions, are a prime focus for nudging interventions targeting sustainable food choice. Before these interventions can be implemented, we need to know more about both restaurant managers' and customers' approval of these interventions. In this series of studies, we measured the evaluation of eight different co-created nudge strategies towards sustainable eating to be implemented in a restaurant context in two large, representative samples of restaurant managers ( n = 125) and customers ( n = 989). We find that overall, both restaurant managers and customers are positive about all proposed nudges. For restaurant managers, only the default was evaluated slightly less positive than the others, while for customers, information indicators (visibility, checkmarks, and icons) were slightly preferred. For restaurant managers, appreciation of nudges was predicted by the degree they saw vegetarianism as an opportunity, while for customers this was predicted by perceived outcome efficacy of restaurants, their own willingness to change, their libertarianism, and their perceived importance of vegetarian food. Furthermore, restaurant managers and customers both clearly evaluated “local” and “vegetarian” food differently. Despite overall positive evaluations, actual implementation was very low, which may relate to restaurant managers being unaware of customers' positive appraisal. Future research should endeavor to find what practical barriers towards implementation restaurant managers encounter, and how the role of customers can be supportive of the global transition towards sustainable food choices. • Approval of nudge strategies is high for both restaurant owners and customers. • Despite high approval of all nudge strategies, actual implementation is very low. • For restaurant owners, nudge approval is predicted by vegetarianism as opportunity. • Both groups distinguished between local and vegetarian when evaluating sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105530
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Waiter, the checkmark please”: Restaurant managers' and customers' evaluations of nudges towards sustainable food choices

Marleen Gillebaart, Robert J. Weijers, Denise T. D. de Ridder
1 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
1.16
article

“Waiter, the checkmark please”: Restaurant managers' and customers' evaluations of nudges towards sustainable food choices

Marleen Gillebaart, Robert J. Weijers, Denise T. D. de Ridder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food choices play a key role in sustainability. Restaurants, given their significant impact on food-related carbon emissions, are a prime focus for nudging interventions targeting sustainable food choice. Before these interventions can be implemented, we need to know more about both restaurant managers' and customers' approval of these interventions. In this series of studies, we measured the evaluation of eight different co-created nudge strategies towards sustainable eating to be implemented in a restaurant context in two large, representative samples of restaurant managers ( n = 125) and customers ( n = 989). We find that overall, both restaurant managers and customers are positive about all proposed nudges. For restaurant managers, only the default was evaluated slightly less positive than the others, while for customers, information indicators (visibility, checkmarks, and icons) were slightly preferred. For restaurant managers, appreciation of nudges was predicted by the degree they saw vegetarianism as an opportunity, while for customers this was predicted by perceived outcome efficacy of restaurants, their own willingness to change, their libertarianism, and their perceived importance of vegetarian food. Furthermore, restaurant managers and customers both clearly evaluated “local” and “vegetarian” food differently. Despite overall positive evaluations, actual implementation was very low, which may relate to restaurant managers being unaware of customers' positive appraisal. Future research should endeavor to find what practical barriers towards implementation restaurant managers encounter, and how the role of customers can be supportive of the global transition towards sustainable food choices. • Approval of nudge strategies is high for both restaurant owners and customers. • Despite high approval of all nudge strategies, actual implementation is very low. • For restaurant owners, nudge approval is predicted by vegetarianism as opportunity. • Both groups distinguished between local and vegetarian when evaluating sustainability.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 130
Utrecht University (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.