The finalité of the European Union’s enlargement

Abstract This article demonstrates that there are currently two problems found deep inside the enlargement law of the European Union. First, partially because of its perception as a primarily political tool, the enlargement of the EU tends to be an indefinite process, something also seen when it comes to the accession of individual countries. Secondly, accession to the Union is regarded as merit-based and political at the same time despite the apparent irreconcilability of these two characteristics. As a solution to these problems, this article suggests that the enlargement law of the Union should be fundamentally revisited in terms of its finalité . Unlike European integration as a whole, the enlargement of the Union needs a clearly defined end goal and purpose. This can be done in particular by regulating the accession process in primary law instead of in soft law instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ERA Forum
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-025-00838-8
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The finalité of the European Union’s enlargement

Serhii Lashyn
ERA Forum
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The finalité of the European Union’s enlargement

Serhii Lashyn
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article demonstrates that there are currently two problems found deep inside the enlargement law of the European Union. First, partially because of its perception as a primarily political tool, the enlargement of the EU tends to be an indefinite process, something also seen when it comes to the accession of individual countries. Secondly, accession to the Union is regarded as merit-based and political at the same time despite the apparent irreconcilability of these two characteristics. As a solution to these problems, this article suggests that the enlargement law of the Union should be fundamentally revisited in terms of its finalité . Unlike European integration as a whole, the enlargement of the Union needs a clearly defined end goal and purpose. This can be done in particular by regulating the accession process in primary law instead of in soft law instruments.

ERA ForumVol. 26(2)
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Australian Government, Universität Hamburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.