The minor’s healthcare

This article explores the regulation of children’s healthcare under French law, taking into consideration the role of parents, the welfare of the child, and the child’s autonomy. Parents primarily make healthcare decisions on behalf of their child’s, acting as representatives of the child’s best interests within the framework of parental authority. The level of consent required depends on the seriousness of the medical decision at hand; for everyday medical matters, one parent’s consent may suffice, while decisions involving the child’s physical well-being may necessitate consent from both parents. Despite the central role of parents, French law underscores that all parental decisions must prioritise the child’s welfare. Consequently, parents cannot make arbitrary decisions, and certain actions are mandatory, even if parents are unwilling to carry them out. Furthermore, in the past four decades, there has been a growing emphasis on children’s rights, prompting the French legislator to increasingly acknowledge children’s voices, especially in healthcare-related matters. Today, the legislator grants various rights to the child, such as the right to veto, the right to consent to decisions alongside their parents, and sometimes the right to act independently without consulting their parents. In sum, French legislation has aimed to strike a balance between recognising the child’s autonomy and the imperative of protecting them from their own decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Medicine and Public Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101089
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The minor’s healthcare

L. Sauvé
Ethics Medicine and Public Health
Child and Adolescent Health
article

The minor’s healthcare

L. Sauvé
article en

Abstract

This article explores the regulation of children’s healthcare under French law, taking into consideration the role of parents, the welfare of the child, and the child’s autonomy. Parents primarily make healthcare decisions on behalf of their child’s, acting as representatives of the child’s best interests within the framework of parental authority. The level of consent required depends on the seriousness of the medical decision at hand; for everyday medical matters, one parent’s consent may suffice, while decisions involving the child’s physical well-being may necessitate consent from both parents. Despite the central role of parents, French law underscores that all parental decisions must prioritise the child’s welfare. Consequently, parents cannot make arbitrary decisions, and certain actions are mandatory, even if parents are unwilling to carry them out. Furthermore, in the past four decades, there has been a growing emphasis on children’s rights, prompting the French legislator to increasingly acknowledge children’s voices, especially in healthcare-related matters. Today, the legislator grants various rights to the child, such as the right to veto, the right to consent to decisions alongside their parents, and sometimes the right to act independently without consulting their parents. In sum, French legislation has aimed to strike a balance between recognising the child’s autonomy and the imperative of protecting them from their own decisions.

Ethics Medicine and Public HealthVol. 33
University of Essex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Child and Adolescent Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.