Exercise capacity in patients surviving of the COVID-19: one year of follow-up

Background: After recovery from COVID-19, potential physical and functional sequelae lead to limitations in exercise tolerance. Evaluate exercise capacity in COVID-19 survivors at baseline, post-pulmonary rehabilitation, and one-year follow-up. Methods: Prospective longitudinal follow-up study of 15 patients post-COVID-19. Each participant underwent a comprehensive assessment during two visits: 1st visit = Clinical evaluation [Maximum Inspiratory Pressure; Maximum Expiratory Pressure; Duke Activity Status Index Questionnaire (estimated VO2)]; 2nd visit = Physical evaluation [Handgrip Strength and 6-minute step test]. The post-pulmonary rehabilitation consisted of breathing exercises, neuromuscular and aerobic exercises, 2 or 3 times/week, for 3 months. For the analysis, we used the following variation deltas: ∆1 (post-PRP to baseline); ∆2 (one-year follow-up to post-PRP); ∆3 (variation one-year follow-up to baseline). Results: The post-pulmonary rehabilitation we found significant improvements: [Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (∆1 33.7, p=0.016); estimated VO2 (∆1 10.1, p<0.001); the number of steps (∆1 50.6, p=0.002)].One-year follow-up:[Maximum Expiratory Pressure (∆3 37.1, p=0.024); estimated VO2 (∆3 13.5, p<0.001); the number of steps (∆3 58.6, p<0.001)]; chronotropic responses showed progress over time, with a reduction in resting HR (∆1 -14.1, p=0.006; ∆3 -13.8, p=0.008), greater heart rate recovery (∆3 13.7, p=0.008); lower perception of dyspnea at the 1st minute of recovery (∆1 -1.8, p=0.002; ∆3 -1.8, p<0.001). Conclusion: 3 months post-pulmonary rehabilitation and one-year follow-up after infection, patients showed increases in peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, which were reflected in exercise tolerance as estimated by the 6-minute step test.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.18n.4-133
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exercise capacity in patients surviving of the COVID-19: one year of follow-up

Cássia da Luz Goulart, Luana dos Passos Vieira, Andréa Lúcia Gonçalves da Silva, Cecília Vieira Prestes et al.
Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Exercise capacity in patients surviving of the COVID-19: one year of follow-up

Cássia da Luz Goulart, Luana dos Passos Vieira, Andréa Lúcia Gonçalves da Silva, Cecília Vieira Prestes, Sophia Luiza Eich, Luiza Scheffer Dias, Djennifer Raquel da Rosa, Dieinifer Heloisa Schultz Coelho
article en

Abstract

Background: After recovery from COVID-19, potential physical and functional sequelae lead to limitations in exercise tolerance. Evaluate exercise capacity in COVID-19 survivors at baseline, post-pulmonary rehabilitation, and one-year follow-up. Methods: Prospective longitudinal follow-up study of 15 patients post-COVID-19. Each participant underwent a comprehensive assessment during two visits: 1st visit = Clinical evaluation [Maximum Inspiratory Pressure; Maximum Expiratory Pressure; Duke Activity Status Index Questionnaire (estimated VO2)]; 2nd visit = Physical evaluation [Handgrip Strength and 6-minute step test]. The post-pulmonary rehabilitation consisted of breathing exercises, neuromuscular and aerobic exercises, 2 or 3 times/week, for 3 months. For the analysis, we used the following variation deltas: ∆1 (post-PRP to baseline); ∆2 (one-year follow-up to post-PRP); ∆3 (variation one-year follow-up to baseline). Results: The post-pulmonary rehabilitation we found significant improvements: [Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (∆1 33.7, p=0.016); estimated VO2 (∆1 10.1, p<0.001); the number of steps (∆1 50.6, p=0.002)].One-year follow-up:[Maximum Expiratory Pressure (∆3 37.1, p=0.024); estimated VO2 (∆3 13.5, p<0.001); the number of steps (∆3 58.6, p<0.001)]; chronotropic responses showed progress over time, with a reduction in resting HR (∆1 -14.1, p=0.006; ∆3 -13.8, p=0.008), greater heart rate recovery (∆3 13.7, p=0.008); lower perception of dyspnea at the 1st minute of recovery (∆1 -1.8, p=0.002; ∆3 -1.8, p<0.001). Conclusion: 3 months post-pulmonary rehabilitation and one-year follow-up after infection, patients showed increases in peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, which were reflected in exercise tolerance as estimated by the 6-minute step test.

Contribuciones a las Ciencias SocialesVol. 18(4)
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.