Selection for toxin production in spatially structured environments increases with growth rate

Microbes adopt diverse strategies to successfully compete with coexisting strains for space and resources. One common strategy is the production of toxic compounds to inhibit competitors, but the strength and direction of selection for this strategy vary depending on the environment. Existing theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that growth in spatially structured environments makes toxin production more beneficial because competitive interactions are localized. Because higher growth rates reduce the length scale of interactions in structured environments, theory predicts that toxin production should be especially beneficial under these conditions. We tested this hypothesis by developing a genome-scale metabolic modeling approach and complementing it with comparative genomics to investigate the impact of growth rate on selection for costly toxin production. Our modeling approach expands the current abilities of the dynamic flux balance analysis platform Computation Of Microbial Ecosystems in Time and Space (COMETS) to incorporate signaling and toxin production. Using this capability, we find that our modeling framework predicts that the strength of selection for toxin production increases as growth rate increases. This finding is supported by comparative genomics analyses that include diverse microbial species. Our work emphasizes that toxin production is more likely to be maintained in rapidly growing, spatially structured communities, thus improving our ability to manage microbial communities and informing natural product discovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The ISME Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wraf061
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selection for toxin production in spatially structured environments increases with growth rate

Linda L. Kinkel, Jeremy M. Chacón, Michael J. Smanski, William R. Harcombe et al.
1 citations
The ISME Journal
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
0.81
article

Selection for toxin production in spatially structured environments increases with growth rate

Linda L. Kinkel, Jeremy M. Chacón, Michael J. Smanski, William R. Harcombe, Ave T. Bisesi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Microbes adopt diverse strategies to successfully compete with coexisting strains for space and resources. One common strategy is the production of toxic compounds to inhibit competitors, but the strength and direction of selection for this strategy vary depending on the environment. Existing theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that growth in spatially structured environments makes toxin production more beneficial because competitive interactions are localized. Because higher growth rates reduce the length scale of interactions in structured environments, theory predicts that toxin production should be especially beneficial under these conditions. We tested this hypothesis by developing a genome-scale metabolic modeling approach and complementing it with comparative genomics to investigate the impact of growth rate on selection for costly toxin production. Our modeling approach expands the current abilities of the dynamic flux balance analysis platform Computation Of Microbial Ecosystems in Time and Space (COMETS) to incorporate signaling and toxin production. Using this capability, we find that our modeling framework predicts that the strength of selection for toxin production increases as growth rate increases. This finding is supported by comparative genomics analyses that include diverse microbial species. Our work emphasizes that toxin production is more likely to be maintained in rapidly growing, spatially structured communities, thus improving our ability to manage microbial communities and informing natural product discovery.

The ISME JournalVol. 19(1)
University of Minnesota (US), Biotechnology Institute (US)
National Science Foundation
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.