Navigating Complexity: Perspectives on Risk Assessment in the Era of New Blood-Based Tests for Early Cancer Detection

In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of new, blood-based, single- and multi-cancer detection tests (SCD and MCD), which can detect cancer signals prior to the onset of symptoms or clinical diagnosis of cancer. Recognizing the need for consensus definitions and standardized evidence development frameworks for these new types of blood tests, the Early Detection and Screening Working Group of the Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer Consortium, a collaborative initiative dedicated to advancing standards and best practices, developed and published a lexicon for liquid biopsy-based SCD and MCD tests. During the preparation of the lexicon, the group recognized challenges with regard to the definitions of key terms and concepts describing absolute and RR assessment of intended use populations for cancer screening tests. This article captures the working group's discussions on (i) risk assessment including considerations for adapting historical SCD risk terminology like "average risk" and "elevated risk" to MCD tests, (ii) the implications of this terminology for describing intended use populations, and (iii) the existing gaps in evidence for determination of absolute risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-4269
Citations
1
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Complexity: Perspectives on Risk Assessment in the Era of New Blood-Based Tests for Early Cancer Detection

Peter Kühn, Stephanie A. Sanchez, Christina A. Clarke, Michelle Beidelschies et al.
1 citations
Clinical Cancer Research
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
article

Navigating Complexity: Perspectives on Risk Assessment in the Era of New Blood-Based Tests for Early Cancer Detection

Peter Kühn, Stephanie A. Sanchez, Christina A. Clarke, Michelle Beidelschies, Jody M. Hoyos, Emma B. Alme, Nancy Krunic, Ryan W. Serra, Mark Stewart, Tomasz M. Beer, David Morgenstern, Wendy S. Rubinstein, Girish Putcha, Jonathan P. Beer, Lauren C. Leiman, Dorys Lopez Ramos, Breeana L. Mitchell, Victoria M. Raymond, Jerry Lee, Elissa Quinn, Kathryn Lang, Eric A. Klein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of new, blood-based, single- and multi-cancer detection tests (SCD and MCD), which can detect cancer signals prior to the onset of symptoms or clinical diagnosis of cancer. Recognizing the need for consensus definitions and standardized evidence development frameworks for these new types of blood tests, the Early Detection and Screening Working Group of the Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer Consortium, a collaborative initiative dedicated to advancing standards and best practices, developed and published a lexicon for liquid biopsy-based SCD and MCD tests. During the preparation of the lexicon, the group recognized challenges with regard to the definitions of key terms and concepts describing absolute and RR assessment of intended use populations for cancer screening tests. This article captures the working group's discussions on (i) risk assessment including considerations for adapting historical SCD risk terminology like "average risk" and "elevated risk" to MCD tests, (ii) the implications of this terminology for describing intended use populations, and (iii) the existing gaps in evidence for determination of absolute risks.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 31(12)
University of Southern California (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Prevent Cancer Foundation (US), Mechanical Solutions (United States) (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), CCC Diagnostics (United States) (US), Menlo School (US), Guardant (United States) (US), American University for Humanities (US), Exact Sciences (United States) (US), Meta (United States) (US), Precision for Medicine (United States) (US), Novartis (United States) (US), Building Blocks Learning Academy (US), Natera (United States) (US), Freenome (United States) (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Sweden) (SE), ATUM (United States) (US), Grail (United States) (US), National Cancer Institute (US), CS Diagnostics (DE), AstraZeneca (United States) (US), Quest Diagnostics (United States) (US), Friends of Cancer Research (US), Seminary of the Southwest (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.